PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Discover Global Society0 citationsOpen Access

The impact of political instability on economic growth in six fragile states in the MENA region including Syria Lebanon Yemen Iraq Sudan and Libya

View Full Paper
IIIssam IyrotHHHind Hamouch

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how political instability affects economic growth in the MENA region's fragile states.
  • Structured comparative case study design
  • Systematic within-case evidence analysis
  • Operationalizes process tracing through event sequences
  • Focuses on FDI collapse and GDP contraction
  • Identifies three key transmission mechanisms: investment climate disruption, human capital erosion, institutional degradation
  • Finds that intensity and duration of political instability correlate with economic declines
  • Demonstrates feedback loops creating 'fragility traps' that reinforce instability

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the relationship between political instability and economic growth in six fragile MENA countries: Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq, Libya, and Sudan. Using a structured comparative case study design that operationalizes process tracing through systematic within-case evidence analysis, including time-aligned event sequences linking conflict onset to FDI collapse and GDP contraction, the study identifies three key transmission mechanisms: investment climate disruption, human capital erosion, and institutional degradation. Rather than treating these mechanisms as discrete, the paper demonstrates their synergistic interaction through documented feedback loops that create self-reinforcing "fragility traps." The study argues that instability creates uncertainty that discourages investment, undermines institutional functioning, and impairs policy delivery. Empirical analysis draws exclusively on verifiable, sourced data: GDP contractions are documented with specific dataset citations (World Bank WDI, IMF WEO), and all estimates are clearly distinguished from official statistics. The comparative framework reveals that the severity of economic decline correlates with the intensity and duration of political instability, with pre-crisis institutional quality moderating the pace rather than the ultimate trajectory of collapse. The paper's core theoretical contribution is demonstrating that institutional collapse generally precedes and predicts investment decline, that conflict duration matters more than intensity for cumulative economic damage, and that threshold effects exist beyond which recovery requires fundamental political settlement rather than economic intervention alone. This paper contributes to political economy and development studies literature by providing a systematic cross-country analysis of cumulative long-term effects of sustained political instability through empirically documented causal mechanisms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Iyrot et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa983604f884e66b531f34https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00394-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global instances of coups from 1950 to 2010: A new dataset2011 · 839 citations
  2. 2Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research2008 · 3,715 citations
  3. 3The Toll of War2017 · 44 citations
  4. 4Greed and grievance in civil war2004 · 6,096 citations
  5. 5Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance1990 · 31,977 citations