PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Parasites & Vectors0 citationsOpen Access

Surveillance of tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from Swiss residents

View Full Paper
EGEhsan GhasemianBMBastian MarquisFTFlorian Tagini

Key Points

  • To characterize the patterns of tick-borne pathogens in ticks removed from humans in Switzerland and their association with tick developmental stages.
  • Utilized the Tick Prevention citizen science app for data collection.
  • Collected and screened tick specimens from Swiss residents during 2018-2020.
  • Performed DNA extraction and quantitative PCR targeting various tick-borne pathogens.
  • 33.3% of examined ticks tested positive for at least one tick-borne pathogen.
  • Borrelia spp. and Rickettsia spp. had the highest infection rates among tick-borne pathogens.
  • Infection prevalence increased with tick developmental stages, reaching 48.9% in adults.

Abstract

Abstract Background Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) represent an increasing public health threat globally. Climate change has facilitated tick range expansion and extended active seasons, contributing to rising TBD incidence rates. In Switzerland, TBDs represent a major health concern. This study aims to characterise patterns in spatio-temporal distribution of tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) in ticks removed from humans across Switzerland, examine associations between tick developmental stages and TBP infection prevalence, and analyse co-infection patterns amongst different TBPs. Methods We employed the “Tick Prevention” citizen science app to collect spatial and temporal data on tick bite incidents and to obtain tick specimens for pathogen screening throughout Switzerland during 2018–2020. Specimens underwent DNA extraction for TBP detection. Quantitative PCR targeted different TBPs at genus and species levels. Data analysis examined TBP infection prevalence in submitted ticks across geographic regions, seasons, and tick developmental stages, including co-infection patterns in ticks. Results Of 1056 tick specimens, 352 (33.3%) tested positive for at least one TBP, with Borrelia spp. (16.3%) and Rickettsia spp. (12.69%) showing higher infection prevalence than other TBPs, including Neoehrlichia mikurensis (5%), Anaplasma phagocytophilum (1.8%), Chlamydiales (1.8%), and Babesia spp. (1.7%). Co-infections occurred in 59 specimens (5.6%), predominantly dual infections (5.2%), with Borrelia spp. and N. mikurensis representing the most common co-infection pattern. Among 58 larvae, 898 nymphs, and 96 adult ticks examined, tick infection prevalence increased with developmental stage, rising from larvae (18.9%) to nymphs (32.6%) to adults (48.9%), consistent with pathogen acquisition through successive blood meals during tick development. Spatially, TBPs were detected across 70 of 76 Swiss administrative regions, with most TBPs displaying uniform distribution. Temporally, tick-human encounters peaked during May–June (59.7% of announced events), with TBP detection rates remaining steady (28–37%) across the tick-active months from April to September. One-third of examined ticks harboured at least one TBP, with weighted models indicating infection prevalence in submitted ticks could reach 45% in certain Swiss Plateau regions. Conclusion These findings emphasise the importance of continued tick and TBP surveillance programmes to inform public health interventions and prevention. Graphical Abstract

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ghasemian et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa986a04f884e66b5322efhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07363-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper