PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026BMJ Open0 citationsOpen Access

Dietary diversity and child malnutrition in Ghana: a nationally representative analysis of socioeconomic gradients and effect modification

View Full Paper
GAGoldfield Edem AzumahASAhlam Tunteeya Saani

Key Points

  • To examine associations between dietary diversity and nutritional status in Ghanaian children under 2 years, while considering socioeconomic factors.
  • Analyzed data from the Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2022 with 2031 children aged 0–23 months.
  • Assessed dietary diversity using WHO minimum dietary diversity indicator.
  • Evaluated nutritional status through WHO z-scores for stunting, wasting, and underweight.
  • Applied survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression to analyze associations.
  • Conducted sensitivity analyses including prevalence ratios and stratified analyses.
  • Only 28.3% of children 6–23 months met minimum dietary diversity criteria, with disparities by wealth and maternal education.
  • Stunting affected 14.8% of children, increasing with age.
  • Minimum dietary diversity linked to 42% reduced odds of underweight (OR=0.58).
  • Wasting showed a protective trend, significant with 8-food-group definition (OR=0.51).
  • No significant association was found for stunting (OR=1.09).

Abstract

Background Inadequate dietary diversity during complementary feeding contributes to high childhood malnutrition rates in sub-Saharan Africa. Understanding relationships between dietary quality and nutritional outcomes across socioeconomic subgroups is essential for designing effective, equitable interventions. Objective We examined associations between dietary diversity and nutritional status among children aged 0–23 months in Ghana, with attention to effect modification by socioeconomic factors. Methods We analysed data from 2031 children Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2022 Dietary diversity was assessed using the WHO minimum dietary diversity indicator (≥5 of 7 food groups consumed in 24 hours). Nutritional status was evaluated through WHO z-scores; stunting, wasting and underweight were defined as z-scores below −2 SD. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression examined associations adjusting for child, maternal, household and geographic factors. Sensitivity analyses included prevalence ratios from modified Poisson regression, an 8-food-group minimum dietary diversity definition and models with region and additional covariates. Stratified analyses tested effect modification. Results Only 28.3% of children aged 6–23 months achieved minimum dietary diversity, with disparities by wealth (20.8% poorest vs 47.6% richest) and maternal education (16.6% no education vs 57.1% higher education). Stunting affected 14.8% of children overall, increasing with age. In fully adjusted models, minimum dietary diversity was associated with a 42% reduction in underweight odds (OR=0.58, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.91, p=0.018). Wasting showed a consistent protective direction (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.11, p=0.110), reaching significance with the 8-food-group definition (OR=0.51, p=0.012) and in dose–response analysis (OR=0.86 per food group, p=0.018). No association was observed for stunting (OR=1.09, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.63, p=0.678). Dose–response patterns were evident for underweight (OR=0.88 per food group, p=0.021) and wasting (OR=0.86, p=0.018). Exploratory stratified analyses suggested stronger protective associations among children of mothers with lower education, though formal interaction tests were non-significant. Conclusions Dietary diversity is associated with reduced acute malnutrition among Ghanaian children, particularly underweight, with suggestive evidence for wasting. The null finding for stunting is consistent with the multifactorial, cumulative aetiology of chronic malnutrition. Findings support incorporating dietary diversity improvement into equity-focused nutrition strategies while recognising that addressing stunting requires broader multi-sectoral approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Azumah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa1eb04f884e66b532a69https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114468
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper