PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Digital Health0 citationsOpen Access

A feasibility randomised controlled trial of an exergaming device aimed at improving mobility in children with cerebral palsy

View Full Paper
RRRachel RapsonBCBernie CarterHHHarriet Hughes

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the feasibility of an RCT using an exergaming device to improve mobility in children with cerebral palsy.
  • 15 children with CP (GMFCS levels I-III) were randomised to 10 weeks of training with the exergaming device or usual care.
  • Primary outcomes measured included center-of-mass estimate motion while stepping and Pediatric Balance Scale at 10 weeks and 20-week follow-up.
  • Participant recruitment rate was monitored and serious adverse events were recorded.
  • Clinically meaningful changes in median PBS scores were observed at 10 weeks: 2.7 in the intervention group compared to 1.7 in control.
  • Recruitment faced challenges with an average of 1.2 participants per month due to device availability.
  • 100% completion of PBS at baseline, dropping to 75% at 10 weeks, while Next Step completion was 87% and then dropped to 65%.

Abstract

Aim A novel interactive exergaming device enables children with cerebral palsy (CP) to exercise whilst standing. A small study showed gains in ankle motion after training with the device. This study explores the feasibility of a community-based randomised controlled trial (RCT) using this device to improve mobility in children with CP (Registered ISRCTN80878394). Method Fifteen children with CP Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-III were randomised 1:1 to either 10-weeks training with the device or usual care. Two potential primary outcome measures were assessed at 10-weeks with 20-week follow up: motion of the centre-of-mass estimate while stepping (Next Step) and Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS). Results Twenty-one children were assessed for eligibility, three declined to participate, two withdrew and one did not receive the intervention but remained in follow-up. Two serious adverse events occurred (n=2). Participant recruitment was 1.2 per month, limited by device availability. Completion of PBS and Next Step was 100% and 87% at baseline, dropping to 75% and 65% respectively at 10-weeks. The intervention group showed clinically meaningful changes in median (interquartile range) PBS at 10-weeks 2.7 (1) compared to the control 1.7 (0.67). Conclusion This study found multiple feasibility issues and further work is needed prior to implementing a RCT. There were signs of efficacy of the intervention, but findings are limited by small sample size.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rapson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa1eb04f884e66b532a98https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076261440965
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper