PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026New Perspectives on Turkey0 citationsOpen Access

The “good refugee” ideal in Turkey: analyzing media representations of refugees in the Turkish press (2011–2020)

View Full Paper
BÖBurak Özçetin

Key Points

  • The article examines how refugees are represented in Turkish media and the implications of these representations for their recognition as human.
  • Analyzed 2,285 migration-related news items from eight Turkish newspapers published between 2011 and 2020
  • Conducted qualitative content analysis to categorize media framing
  • Performed close reading of 60 news items focusing on positive/humanitarian storytelling.
  • Media coverage is predominantly negative, with 40% focusing on threat-security-control framing
  • 32% of coverage features a humanitarian-moral frame
  • Identified three recurring 'good refugee' figures: the vulnerable woman/child, the heroic young man, and the talented/entrepreneurial refugee.

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on Agamben’s notion of “bare life” and Fassin’s critique of “humanitarian reason,” this article asks when refugees become recognizable as fully human in Turkish news discourse. It analyzes a simple random sample of 2,285 migration-related news items published in eight national newspapers between 2011 and 2020 through qualitative content analysis, and complements this with a close reading of sixty items that cluster around positive/humanitarian storytelling. Overall coverage is largely massifying and predominantly negative in tone; framing is dominated by threat–security–control (40 percent) alongside a substantial humanitarian–moral frame (32 percent). The paper’s main contribution is to identify and theorize three recurring “good refugee” figures: (1) the vulnerable woman/child; (2) the heroic young man; and (3) the talented/entrepreneurial refugee whose exceptional skills and achievements are foregrounded. The paper argues that these figures do not merely individualize refugees; they also function as privileged sites where Turkish nationhood is narrated as compassionate, modern, and sovereign – while “ordinary” refugees remain outside the horizon of unconditional humanity and rights. The article argues that humanization strategies may backfire, ultimately eliminating individual subjectivity and agency. The article critiques the news items’ compassionate, patronizing, and moralizing tone, highlighting the urgent need to politicize and historicize the issue.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Burak Özçetin (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa2b504f884e66b5333c1https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2026.10089
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pragmatism, moral responsibility or policy change: the Syrian refugee crisis and selective humanitarianism in the Turkish refugee regime2016 · 75 citations
  2. 2The refugee crisis and fear2004 · 200 citations
  3. 3The Culture of Exception2005 · 164 citations
  4. 4Speechless Emissaries: Refugees, Humanitarianism, and Dehistoricization1996 · 1,667 citations
  5. 5Across the threshold: negotiations of deservingness among unaccompanied young refugees in Sweden2019 · 91 citations