PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Sustainable Development1 citations

Internal Audit Competency, Audit Function Maturity, and ESG Assurance Engagement: Evidence From a Machine Learning Approach

View Full Paper
MSMohamed ShetaBIBassam A. IbrahimMOMohamed Nagy Osman

Key Points

  • This research examines how internal audit competency and maturity influence ESG assurance participation.
  • Analyzed data from the Common Body of Knowledge in internal auditing
  • Applied a machine learning approach to assess predictive power
  • Evaluated predictive performance with an 80/20 train-test split
  • Internal audit competency is the most significant determinant of ESG assurance engagement
  • Model explains 50.971% of the variance in the test sample
  • Internal audit maturity has a weaker influence than expected

Abstract

ABSTRACT The increasing demand for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) assurance has intensified scrutiny on internal auditors' roles in corporate sustainability efforts. Despite this, limited research examines how Internal Audit Competency (IAC) and Internal Audit Maturity (IAM) influence internal auditors' involvement in ESG assurance. Drawing on the Common Body of Knowledge in internal auditing dataset, this study employs a machine learning approach to assess the predictive power of IAC and IAM in shaping internal auditors' ESG assurance engagement. Our findings reveal that IAC is the most influential determinant, significantly outperforming other factors, including Chief Audit Executive (CAE) education and departmental maturity. Notably, internal audit maturity, often considered a cornerstone of audit effectiveness, exhibits a weaker‐than‐expected influence, suggesting that individual auditors' expertise outweighs structural factors in driving ESG assurance participation. Predictive performance is evaluated using a pre‐specified 80/20 train–test split (SPLIT indicator); the model explains 50.971% of the variance in the held‐out test sample (test R 2 = 0.50971; RMSE = 2.89164; MAE = 2.20016). These insights carry critical implications for organisations, regulators, and professional bodies, highlighting the need to refine competency development frameworks and reconsider the emphasis on structural maturity in internal audit functions. By bridging the gap between internal audit effectiveness and ESG assurance, this study provides a novel perspective on the intersection of corporate governance, assurance quality, and sustainable business practices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sheta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa2b504f884e66b533502https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper