This paper introduces a comparative analysis of urban housing conflicts across eight major Canadian cities, Toronto, Vancouver, Québec, Ottawa, Calgary, Edmonton, St. John’s, and Halifax, over a 20-year period. Using Large Language Models (LLMs), we implement a structured workflow to extract, classify, and organize more than one thousand conflict instances from diverse textual sources, including municipal reports, media archives, and non-governmental organization publications. The methodological contribution lies in demonstrating how an LLM-assisted pipeline, combining schema-based extraction, prompt perturbation, and a two-phase calibration procedure, can generate structured, multi-city conflict datasets while addressing challenges such as output homogenization and sensitivity to prompt design. The findings highlight both shared national tendencies and city-specific configurations with post-2020 conflicts intensifying. Overall, the study proposes a transparent workflow for applying LLMs to conflict-related text analysis and offers an exploratory overview of the spatial, temporal, and semantic regularities of housing conflicts in Canadian cities.
Trudelle et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: