PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2011Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine64 citations

Comparison of high sensitivity and contemporary troponin assays for the early detection of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department

View Full Paper
SASally AldousCFChris FlorkowskiICIan Crozier

Structured PICO

Does high sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) improve the early detection of acute myocardial infarction compared to contemporary troponin assays in patients with chest pain?

P
Population
332 patients with chest pain suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) prospectively recruited in the emergency department
I
Intervention
Roche Elecsys high sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) assay
C
Comparator
Abbott Architect troponin I 3rd generation (TnI 3) and Roche Elecsys troponin T (TnT) assays
O
Outcome
Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) quantified by receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC)surrogate

High sensitivity troponin T is superior to contemporary troponin T, but equivalent to 3rd generation troponin I, for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines define acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by the rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin with ≥1 value above the 99th percentile. Past troponin assays have been unreliable at the lower end of the range. Highly sensitive assays have therefore been developed to increase the clinical sensitivity for detection of myocardial injury. METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-two patients with chest pain suggestive of AMI were prospectively recruited between November 2006 and April 2007. Serial blood samples were analysed to compare Roche Elecsys high sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), Abbott Architect troponin I 3rd generation (TnI 3) and Roche Elecsys troponin T (TnT) for the diagnosis of AMI. RESULTS: One hundred and ten (33.1%) patients were diagnosed with AMI. Test performance for the diagnosis of AMI, as quantified by receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (95% confidence intervals) for baseline/follow-up troponins were as follows: hsTnT 0.90 (0.87-0.94)/0.94 (0.91-0.97), TnI 3 0.88 (0.84-0.92)/0.93 (0.90-0.96) and TnT 0.80 (0.74-0.85)/0.89 (0.85-0.94). hsTnT was superior to TnT (P < 0.001/0.013 at baseline/follow-up) but equivalent to TnI 3. For patients with a final diagnosis of AMI, baseline troponins were raised in more patients for hsTnT (83.6%) than TnI 3 (74.5%) and TnT (62.7%). A delta troponin of ≥20% increased the specificity of hsTnT from 80.6% to 93.7% but reduced sensitivity from 90.9% to 71.8%. CONCLUSION: hsTnT was superior to TnT but equivalent to TnI 3 for the diagnosis of AMI. Serial troponin measurement increased test performance. hsTnT was the most likely to be raised at baseline in those with AMI. A delta troponin increases specificity but reduces sensitivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aldous et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fab3cb79c9fe70ce3f5659https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2010.010219
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper