PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 6, 2008European Heart Journal235 citations

Novel biomarkers in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction compared with cardiac troponin T

View Full Paper
CMConor McCannBGBen GloverIMIan Menown

Structured PICO

Does assessment of novel biomarkers like H-FABP improve early detection of acute myocardial infarction compared to admission cTnT in patients presenting with acute chest pain?

P
Population
664 patients presenting to two coronary care units with acute chest pain
I
Intervention
Assessment of novel biomarkers including heart fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) on admission
C
Comparator
Admission cardiac troponin T (cTnT)
O
Outcome
Early detection of acute myocardial infarction (MI defined as cTnT >= 0.03 microg/L at >= 12 h)surrogate

H-FABP assessment within the first 4 hours of symptom onset provides superior sensitivity to admission cTnT for early detection of acute myocardial infarction.

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the role of novel biomarkers in early detection of acute myocardial infarction (MI) in patients admitted with acute chest pain. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective study of 664 patients presenting to two coronary care units with chest pain was conducted over 3 years from 2003. Patients were assessed on admission: clinical characteristics, ECG (electrocardiogram), renal function, cardiac troponin T (cTnT), heart fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), glycogen phosphorylase-BB, NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide, D-dimer, hsCRP (high sensitivity C-reactive protein), myeloperoxidase, matrix metalloproteinase-9, pregnancy associated plasma protein-A, soluble CD40 ligand. A > or = 12 h cTnT sample was also obtained. MI was defined as cTnT > or = 0.03 microg/L. In patients presenting <4 h of symptom onset, sensitivity of H-FABP for MI was significantly higher than admission cTnT (73 vs. 55%; P = 0.043). Specificity of H-FABP was 71%. None of the other biomarkers challenged cTnT. Combined use of H-FABP and cTnT (either one elevated initially) significantly improved the sensitivities of H-FABP or cTnT (85%; P < or = 0.004). This combined approach also improved the negative predictive value, negative likelihood ratio, and the risk ratio. CONCLUSION: Assessment of H-FABP within the first 4 h of symptoms is superior to cTnT for detection of MI, and is a useful additional biomarker for patients with acute chest pain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McCann et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fab3d679c9fe70ce3f568chttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn363
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper