PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Smart and Sustainable Built Environment2 citations

BIM and generative design for modular, circular, resilient post-disaster housing in Türkiye

View Full Paper
MTM. Yunus TakSASepehr AbrishamiRSReyhaneh Shojaei

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop an integrated framework using BIM, generative design, and off-site manufacturing for post-disaster housing reconstruction.
  • Specified a workflow combining BIM, generative design, and off-site manufacturing.
  • Conducted a survey of 158 architects in Türkiye to identify bottlenecks and solutions.
  • Assessed perceived alignment of the integrated approach with disaster management needs.
  • Respondents supported the integrated approach emphasizing the critical role of BIM for coordination.
  • Preferred reuse of temporary housing over demolition, though material and design constraints limited acceptance.
  • Noted off-site manufacturing showed weaker alignment with challenges, indicating the need for better contextual adaptation.

Abstract

Purpose Post-disaster housing reconstruction often suffers systemic failures in coordination, resource efficiency and long-term resilience. These shortcomings increase the vulnerability of affected communities. This study proposes and tests an integrated framework that combines building information modelling (BIM), generative design and off-site manufacturing to deliver post-disaster housing. The framework promotes regenerative outcomes by enhancing circularity, resilience and social value throughout the disaster management cycle and the asset lifecycle. Design/methodology/approach The study specifies a workflow in which BIM provides coordination and data integration, generative design supports context-sensitive options and off-site manufacturing accelerates delivery and reuse. Empirical validation draws on a survey of 158 practising architects in Türkiye, a high seismic-risk context, assessing bottlenecks, perceived solutions and their alignment. Findings Respondents endorsed the integrated approach. Coordination and logistics were critical bottlenecks, with BIM rated as an effective lever. Reuse of temporary housing units was preferred over demolition, yet material suitability and design constraints limited adoption, suggesting low recognition of generative design. Off-site manufacturing was valued but showed weaker alignment with challenges, signalling a need for contextual adaptation and professional familiarisation. Practical implications The results prioritise early information coordination, reuse planning and logistics management. They point to design-space exploration for adaptable modules and to deployment protocols that connect design decisions with manufacturing and assembly. Originality/value The article integrates BIM, generative design and off-site manufacturing across disaster phases and the building lifecycle providing empirical evidence of practitioner support for a standards-aware, regenerative pathway for reconstruction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fadad703f892aec9b1e724https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-10-2025-0662
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper