Rapid antigen tests targeting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein were essential for decentralised testing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Independent performance evaluations are essential to support regulatory approval and inform clinical implementation, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study presents a retrospective analytical and operational evaluation of two instrument-based fluorescent immunoassays (FIAs): the PCL COVID-19 Ag Rapid FIA and LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test. Analytical sensitivity was determined using recombinant nucleocapsid protein and viral cultures. Clinical performance was assessed using residual clinical specimens (n = 110) with RT-PCR as a reference, stratified by cycle threshold (Ct). Operational characteristics were assessed using a structured Likert framework. Overall sensitivity was 63% (51–73) for PCL and 95% (88–99) for LumiraDx. For Ct ≤ 25, sensitivity increased to 93% and 100%. Specificity was ≥97% for both. LumiraDx maintained sensitivity (83–94%) at Ct 25–30, whereas PCL did not detect any positives in this range. The limit of detection was 39 pM (PCL) and 0.6 pM (LumiraDx). Operational usability was high for both (90% PCL, 87% LumiraDx). LumiraDx showed higher analytical sensitivity across a broader viral load range, supporting primary diagnostic use, whereas PCL was limited to high viral loads. This evaluation provides a reproducible framework for rapid diagnostic assessment during emerging outbreaks.
Keshav et al. (2026) studied this question.