PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Agronomy Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Soybean response to cover crop and nitrogen fertilizer timing on sandy soil

View Full Paper
AWAlexandra WaltersGCGrace A. CagleZFZachary B. Freedman

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effects of nitrogen fertilization timing and cover crops on soybean yield in sandy soils.
  • Conducted a 2-year field study in Wisconsin
  • Assessed varying nitrogen application rates and timings
  • Included an unfertilized control and treatments with cover crops
  • Yield varied with nitrogen treatments and years
  • Increased yield by 7% observed in 2019, no significant effects in 2020
  • Cover crop showed no impact on yield or nitrogen content in 2020

Abstract

Abstract The potential for nitrogen (N) fertilization to increase soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr. yield is known to vary with environmental conditions, but the effects of N timing and rate remain unclear in sandy soils. A 2‐year field study was conducted in central Wisconsin to determine the effect of a rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop and N application rate and timing on soybean yield and in‐season dry matter and N accumulation. Treatments included an unfertilized control; a starter application (34 kg‐N ha − 1 ); single applications of 101 kg‐N ha − 1 at 10, 30, 60, or 80 days after emergence (DAE); and split applications totaling 202 or 404 kg‐N ha − 1 applied at 30, 60, and 80 DAE. All fertilizer treatments were nested within a rye cover crop system, planted in the fall and chemically terminated in May prior to soybean planting. Fertilizer effects on yield varied by year. In 2019, the split404 treatment increased yield by 7% relative to the control, while in 2020 no fertilizer treatments significantly affected yield. Both years, starter and 10 DAE treatments increased August N uptake relative to the control but starter led to a slight reduction in N uptake in June in both years. Cover cropping had no effect on soybean yield, dry matter, or N content in 2020, and poor establishment in 2019 prevented meaningful evaluation of effects. Overall, the yield gain observed in 2019 was insufficient to justify the added fertilizer cost, and the effect was not replicated the following year. Therefore, we find no evidence that N fertilization improves yield in irrigated soybean grown on sandy soils in Wisconsin.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Walters et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe2b3164b5133a91a214fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70396
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cereal rye cover crop termination at or before soybean planting has minimal effect on soybean yield across the midwestern US2024 · 18 citations
  2. 2Time Course of Nitrogen Fixation in Field‐Grown Soybean Using Nitrogen‐15 Methodology 11987 · 201 citations
  3. 3Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures.1998 · 2,847 citations
  4. 4Cover Crops and Ecosystem Services: Insights from Studies in Temperate Soils2015 · 1,185 citations
  5. 5Soybean Yield as Affected by Biomass and Nitrogen Uptake of Cereal Rye in Winter Cover Crop Rotations2004 · 117 citations