PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Analysis of the dynamic relationship between urban economic growth and energy consumption and environmental quality response from the perspective of an improved VAR model

View Full Paper
LXLei XieWZWeiran Zhou

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the dynamic relationship between urban economic growth and energy consumption.
  • Dynamic correlation analysis using an improved VAR model
  • Integration of heteroskedasticity and differential evolution algorithms
  • Granger causality analysis among urbanization, economic growth, and energy consumption
  • Confirmed causal relationships among urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and environmental quality
  • Energy consumption impacts environmental quality between 0.2 and 0.4, with economic growth rising to 0.4
  • Recommendations for integrating energy conservation and emission reduction into urban economic planning

Abstract

To acquire a thorough comprehension of the changing interplay between urban economic expansion and energy usage, the research conducts a dynamic correlation analysis between energy and the economy, integrating heteroskedasticity and differential evolution algorithms to bolster the vector autoregressive model. The experimental results indicated that the improvement strategy enhanced the convergence and solution set distribution of the differential evolutionary algorithm. Granger causality has been identified among urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and environmental quality, indicating that timely modifications to economic development and energy strategies can yield positive impacts on urban planning, ecological health, and overall economic progress. While energy consumption and economic growth exhibit a reciprocal influence, it is noteworthy that energy consumption does not serve as a catalyst for sustained long-term economic growth. Consequently, it becomes imperative to incorporate the principles of energy conservation, emission reduction, and environmental protection into the framework of urban economic development planning. Meanwhile, the effect of energy consumption on variables other than urbanization fluctuated greatly, the impact on environmental quality fluctuated from 0.2 to 0.4, and the impact on economic growth continued to rise to 0.4. The methodology suggested by the study accurately mirrors the actual conditions of the economy and energy use. This helps both the government and businesses understand the trends in economic development and make necessary adjustments to their energy strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe2b3164b5133a91a21d2https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Correlation analysis of energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Investigating the Nexus between Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Bangladesh: The Role of Renewable Energy2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Correlation between energy consumption and economic growth – based on the perspective of panel vector autoregressive analysis2024
  4. 4The Effects of Economic Cycle Shocks on Polluting Emissions in Developing Countries: Insights from a Panel Vector Autoregression Analysis2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5The moderating role of urbanisation in the environmental impact of economic complexity and capital formation: Evidence from OECD countries2025