PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Surgical Practice0 citations

Retrospective study of outcomes of oesophageal atresia in a single surgical centre over 20 years

View Full Paper
LCLok Hang CheungVWVicky Hei Yi WongECEdwin Kin Wai Chan

Key Points

  • Assess the surgical outcomes and complications of oesophageal atresia in neonates over a 20-year period.
  • Retrospective review of neonates with oesophageal atresia
  • Analysis of patient demographics and operation approaches
  • Evaluation of short and long-term outcomes
  • Sixty-three neonates with oesophageal atresia were included
  • Over 90% had successful oral feeding at follow-up
  • Anastomotic leak occurred in 3 cases, with 17 needing endoscopic dilatation

Abstract

Abstract Objective Assess the outcomes of oesophageal atresia (OA) in a single paediatric surgery centre over 20 years. Methods Retrospective review of neonates with OA with analysis of patient demographics, operation approaches, short and long‐term outcomes. Results Sixty‐three neonates (37 males, 26 females; median gestational age 37.6 weeks) were included. Most patients had type C OA. Cardiac anomalies (49%) were most associated. Fifty‐two patients (83%) underwent primary anastomosis, with 34 receiving thoracotomy repair and 18 thoracoscopic repair. Major anastomotic leak requiring surgery occurred in three cases. Long gap OA (LGOA) and thoracoscopic repair were not associated with inferior surgical outcomes. Three patients had recurrent tracheo‐oesophageal fistula (TOF). Seventeen patients required endoscopic dilatation of oesophageal strictures. Fifty‐eight patients (93%) tolerated oral feeding at latest follow up. There were six mortalities, with significant association with pre‐term neonates ( p = 0.01) and LGOA ( p < 0.01). Four out of five patients with LGOA passed away before secondary definitive surgery due to congenital comorbidities. Conclusion Our centre achieved over 90% survival and oral feeding rates in OA patients. Pre‐term neonates and neonates with LGOA showed higher mortality risk. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow‐up are warranted to clarify the benefits of thoracoscopic repair.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheung et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe2b3164b5133a91a22d1https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-1633.70070
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Perioperative management and outcomes of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula2016 · 189 citations
  2. 2Anastomotic dilatation after repair of esophageal atresia with distal fistula. Comparison of results after routine versus selective dilatation2008 · 50 citations
  3. 3The Global Burden of Major Gastrointestinal Anomalies: A Global, Systematic Review of Gastrointestinal Anomaly Birth Prevalence2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Whether prophylactic intraoperative chest drain insertion in esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula is an evidence-based practice or just a prejudice: A systematic review and meta-analysis2021 · 10 citations
  5. 5Thoracoscopy versus Thoracotomy for Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair: Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis2012 · 115 citations