PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Anthromusicology

View Full Paper
TGThomas Graves

Key Points

  • This work aims to redefine the field of ethnomusicology into a more inclusive term, anthromusicology.
  • The discussion includes historical perspectives on the naming of ethnomusicology.
  • Arguments are presented for the need to expand the field's definitions and focus.
  • The article critiques the implications of the term 'ethno-' in scholarly contexts.
  • Proposes a broader definition of music as integral to human experience.
  • Highlights the discomfort among scholars regarding the term 'ethno-'.
  • Calls for an improved understanding of music's role across diverse human contexts.

Abstract

Throughout its history, the question of whether the field of ethnomusicology should be renamed, abolished, or combined with other fields has periodically re-emerged. The most common reason given for this is scholars' discomfort with the prefix "ethno-". From a lay perspective, ethnomusicology gives the immediate impression of the study of music as it relates to ethnicity or to "the Other", giving an incorrect and problematic view of what it is ethnomusicologists do. This article argues for a reframing and expansion of the field as "anthromusicology," not defined as "the study of people making music", but more broadly, as the holistic study of the place music, broadly defined, holds in human life, in all its diversity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas Graves (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe3ca164b5133a91a3159https://doi.org/10.17613/kj3zh-grm88
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper