PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Power and Education0 citationsOpen Access

Leadership agility and institutional resilience: The mediating roles of digital readiness and strategic adaptation in Chinese higher education digital transformation

View Full Paper
WXWu XiaoyingAYAbdullahi Yusuf

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how leadership agility affects institutional resilience through digital readiness and strategic adaptation.
  • Survey of 445 senior administrators in Chinese higher education institutions
  • Participants included vice chancellors, deans, and department heads
  • Used validated scales to measure key variables
  • Employed structural equation modeling for analysis
  • Significant correlation between leadership agility and institutional resilience (β = 0.28)
  • Leadership agility linked to digital readiness (β = 0.52) and strategic adaptation (β = 0.30)
  • Mediation analysis shows an indirect pathway from leadership agility to institutional resilience (β = 0.09)
  • Organizational innovation climate moderated effects of digital readiness (β = 0.14) and strategic adaptation (β = 0.16)

Abstract

As higher education institutions (HEIs) navigate complex digital transformation demands, leadership agility has emerged as a critical determinant of institutional resilience. This study examined the mechanisms through which leadership agility is associated with institutional resilience, focusing on the mediating roles of digital readiness and strategic adaptation, and the moderating role of organizational innovation climate. Data were collected from 445 senior administrators across Chinese HEIs, including vice chancellors, deans, directors, and heads of departments. Participants completed validated scales measuring leadership agility, digital readiness, strategic adaptation, innovation climate, and institutional resilience. Structural equation modeling was employed to test direct, mediated, and moderated pathways. Results revealed significant associations between leadership agility and institutional resilience (β = 0.28), digital readiness (β = 0.52), and strategic adaptation (β = 0.30). Mediation analyses indicated indirect statistical pathways linking leadership agility with institutional resilience (β = 0.09). Furthermore, organizational innovation climate significantly moderated the effects of digital readiness (β = 0.14) and strategic adaptation (β = 0.16). The findings highlight the need for agile leadership that cultivates digital preparedness and adaptive strategies, particularly in innovation-supportive environments. Implications are discussed for leadership development and organizational design within the Chinese HEIs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xiaoying et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe3ca164b5133a91a31b5https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438261442768
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Leading through digital disruption: how digital leadership shapes innovation culture and organisational resilience2026
  2. 2Digital leadership as a strategic moderator between IT determinants and sustainable innovation performance: evidence from an emerging economy2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3Integrating Contingency Strategies and Organizational Resilience to Enhance Institutional Adaptability and Educational Quality in Chinese Higher Education2025
  4. 4The Influence of Digital Leadership on Students’ Employability Readiness in Chinese Private Colleges: The Mediating Role of Learning Motivation2026
  5. 5Artificial intelligence–driven knowledge management and digital competence as drivers of institutional agility in higher education2026