PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026CASTE / A Global Journal on Social Exclusion0 citationsOpen Access

From the Pali Turn to The Buddha and His Dhamma: Reading Ambedkar as a Philologist

View Full Paper
AAAli Ahsan

Key Points

  • This research explores B.R. Ambedkar's role as a philologist and his impact on Buddhism and language.
  • Engaged with three strands of Ambedkar's scholarship
  • Analyzed his writings on Pali and liturgical languages
  • Historical analysis of caste hierarchy in relation to Ambedkar's critique
  • Identified Ambedkar as a key philologist in Buddhism
  • Highlighted the critique of Brahmanism and caste systems
  • Demonstrated a shift in sacred concepts from Hinduism to Buddhism

Abstract

This article reconstructs B.R. Ambedkar as a philologist by engaging with three different strands of his scholarship. First, it traces his work on language in general and his construction of Pali as a language emblematic of Buddhism. By following cues in Ambedkar’s own writings and historicizing it, the article in its second section close reads the major historical stakes of his work. These two strands focus on how liturgical languages engage with caste hierarchy, and how ancient Indian history is perceived anew through Ambedkar’s critique of Brahmanism alongside contemporary scholarship on history. This long historical thread culminates in The Buddha and His Dhamma along with the focus on religion within his writings, which forms the third section of the article. I propose that the three strands together complete the trajectory of Ambedkar’s philological project for which he lays a critical foundation through an overarching history of India and its linguistic and religious past. In the article, the object of analysis is caste as a non-static category and how it functions from antiquity to the mid-twentieth century. Ultimately, I argue that Ambedkar reformulates the idea of what it means to be sacred from a Navayana Buddhist point of view, symbolized through a move away from Hinduism, which he announced at the Yeola conference in 1935, to the moment of his conversion to Buddhism in 1956.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ali Ahsan (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbef68164b5133a91a3453https://doi.org/10.26812/caste.v7i1.2694
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Three S’s of Being: Swayambhu, Skandhas, and Śūnyatā in Ambedkar’s Deconstruction of Caste-Self2026
  2. 2FROM CASTE TO COMPASSION : DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR AND THE REVIVAL OF BUDDHISM IN INDIA2025
  3. 3Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's Buddhism and Global Philosophies in the 21st Century2026
  4. 4Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's Buddhism and Global Philosophies in the 21st Century2026
  5. 5Ambedkar’s Navayana Buddhism: mobilising Buddhism towards an ethical and emancipatory ‘International’2026