PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Retina0 citations

Surgical Management and Outcomes of Large High Myopic Macular Holes: Global Macular Hole Multicenter Study 3

View Full Paper
TLTianyu LiuNANassim A. Abreu-ArbajeJAJoana Andoh

Key Points

  • This study aims to characterize the surgical management and outcomes associated with large high myopic macular holes (HMMHs).
  • Global multicenter retrospective case series of HMMHs with minimum linear diameter ≥ 400 μm undergoing surgery from 2013-2023
  • Surgical techniques included internal limiting membrane peels, amniotic membrane transplantation, among others
  • Follow-up duration of at least 3 months to assess outcomes
  • Closure rate for all cases at postoperative month 3 was 72.4%
  • Visual acuity improved significantly post-surgery across all eyes
  • Closure rates varied by surgery techniques and were lower than expected for non-highly myopic eyes

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize the surgical management and outcomes of large high myopic macular holes (HMMHs). Methods: Global multicenter retrospective case series of HMMHs with minimum linear diameter (MLD) ≥ 400 μm undergoing surgery between 2013-2023 with follow up ≥ 3 months. The main outcome measure was the HMMH closure rate at postoperative month 3. Results: 499 cases of 463 patients from 37 surgeons were included, with mean ± SD age 58.3 ± 12.2 years, 77.0% female, 77.4% primary, 22.6% refractory, and mean ± SD follow-up 18.8 ± 20.2 months. The mean ± SD (range) MLD was 649 ± 280 (400, 2759) µm. Surgery techniques included 127 internal limiting membrane (ILM) peels, 285 ILM flaps, 19 amniotic membrane transplantations (AMT), 36 autologous retinal transplantations (ART), and 32 others. The postoperative month 3 closure rate for all cases was 72.4%. Closure rates significantly decreased with greater CLOSE Study Group size classification for HMMHs treated with ILM peeling or ILM flap (P = 0.006) but not for HMMHs treated with AMT or ART (P > 0.05). Visual acuity (VA) significantly increased from baseline to each follow-up time point among all eyes, with final mean ± SD change in VA of -0.29 (0.55) logMAR (+14.5 ETDRS letters), which did not significantly differ by surgery type. Conclusion: HMMH closure rates are lower than those reported for macular holes in non-highly myopic eyes, but most eyes can still achieve anatomic closure and meaningful VA gains when treated with the appropriate technique.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbef86164b5133a91a35fdhttps://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004871
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1COMPLEX MACULAR HOLE CLOSURE BY TEMPORAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP WITHOUT ENDOTAMPONADE2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2VITRECTOMY OUTCOMES IN EYES WITH HIGH MYOPIC MACULAR HOLE WITHOUT RETINAL DETACHMENT2011 · 26 citations
  3. 3Outcomes of macular hole surgery in severely myopic eyes: a case-control study2000 · 54 citations
  4. 4Macular buckling versus vitrectomy on macular hole associated macular detachment in eyes with high myopia: a randomised trial2021 · 33 citations
  5. 5Structural and Functional Changes After Macular Hole Surgery2014 · 14 citations