PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026International Journal of Bilingualism0 citations

Evidence for a limited bilingual advantage in phonological short-term memory, but not lexical access and verbal and short-term working memory, skills in older bilingual adults

View Full Paper
HSHanna SzpilczyńskaMŁMarta ŁockiewiczECEwa Czaplewska

Key Points

  • To investigate differences in verbal short-term, working memory, and long-term memory access between bilingual and monolingual older adults.
  • Participants completed a questionnaire assessing L2 knowledge and several psychological tests.
  • The sample included 65 native Polish speakers, with 38 bilinguals and 53 females, aged 60-69.
  • Bilinguals used L2 at work and L1 in daily life; groups matched for age, gender, intelligence, and education.
  • No differences found in verbal fluency and short-term and working memory between bilinguals and monolinguals.
  • Bilinguals outperformed monolinguals only in phonological short-term memory.
  • Findings suggest no overall bilingual advantage in older adults' verbal processing.

Abstract

Aims and objectives: The aim of our study was to investigate the possible differences between verbal short-term and working memory, and long-term memory access in older bilingual and monolingual individuals. Methodology: The participants completed a questionnaire, which included a self-assessment of L2 knowledge, and a series of psychological tests, assessing nonverbal intelligence and verbal memory. The tests were administered individually. Data and analysis: Sixty-five native speakers of Polish, 38 (58.46%) bilingual, 53 (81.54%) female, aged between 60 and 69 years ( M age = 64 years), participated in our study. All participants resided and worked in Poland, thus shared a cultural background, non-immigrant status, and a dominant language (Polish). Moreover, the bilingual and the monolingual groups were matched for gender, age, intelligence, and educational level – all were university graduates with a master’s degree, bilinguals in their L2, monolinguals – not in L2. Findings: We found no differences between the bilingual and the monolingual group in semantic and phonemic verbal fluency (the participants employed similar strategies to access and search through their mental lexicons), verbal short-term and working memory, and rapid automatized naming. The only skill in which the bilinguals outperformed the monolinguals was phonological short-term memory. Originality: We examined a rarely studied group: professional sequential bilinguals, who used L2 at work, while L1 in daily life. All our participants spoke the same L1, had the same migrant status, and had comparable social and cultural experiences, all factors potentially influencing the scores. We also examined rapid automatized naming and phonological short-term memory, which, to our knowledge, had not been previously investigated in older bilinguals. Significance: Our findings provide further evidence for no bilingual advantage (or disadvantage) in verbal processing in older adults, as, despite using several verbal tasks, we found only one, narrow difference between the groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Szpilczyńska et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefa3164b5133a91a3899https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069261440733
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cognitive reserve relates to executive functioning in the old–old2020 · 30 citations
  2. 2Naming-Speed Processes, Timing, and Reading2000 · 709 citations
  3. 3Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults.1997 · 1,187 citations
  4. 4A Systematic Review on Predictors of Working Memory Training Responsiveness in Healthy Older Adults: Methodological Challenges and Future Directions2020 · 31 citations
  5. 5Towards a dynamic, comprehensive conceptualization of dyslexia2024 · 61 citations