PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Sustainability-Qualified IEQ Indicators for Academic Buildings: A Systematic Review (2010–2025) and SDG-Aligned Framework

View Full Paper
CNCyma Adoracion NatividadJOJoel Opon

Key Points

  • To evaluate and classify indoor environmental quality indicators in academic facilities within a sustainability context.
  • Conducted a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic literature review
  • Screened and mapped indicators from 142 peer-reviewed studies
  • Developed a sustainability-aligned framework for classroom evaluation
  • Identified 118 unique indoor environmental quality indicators
  • Retained 50 indicators as methodologically robust based on screening criteria
  • Mapped indicators to environmental, social, and economic pillars aligned with key Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) strongly influences health, comfort, and learning performance in academic buildings, yet assessment practices remain fragmented and rarely aligned with sustainability goals. This study conducted a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic literature review to identify, screen, and map IEQ indicators for educational facilities and to develop a sustainability-aligned framework for classroom evaluation. Searches of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (2010–2025) yielded 365 records; after de-duplication and eligibility screening, 142 peer-reviewed studies were included. From these, 118 unique IEQ indicators were extracted and classified into six domains: thermal comfort, indoor air quality, acoustic quality, visual comfort, environmental quality, and spatial quality. Using sustainability-oriented screening criteria (measurability, relevance, reliability, data accessibility, understandability, and long-term applicability), 50 indicators (42%) were retained as methodologically robust, while 68 (58%) were excluded due to weak standardization or limited practical applicability. The retained indicators were systematically mapped to the environmental, social, and economic pillars and aligned with key SDGs (3, 4, 7, 11, and 13). The resulting Sustainability-Aligned IEQ Indicator Framework integrates quality-screened indicators with pillar/SDG alignment and a mixed-method pathway that combines objective monitoring and occupant perception, supporting context-sensitive evaluation, particularly for naturally ventilated and tropical learning environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Natividad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefa3164b5133a91a38b5https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094260
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Stability Performance of Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) Parameters: Emphasize the Strategies of Sustainable Comforts in the Learning Environment in a Tropical Climate2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Effect of energy renovation on indoor air quality and thermal environment in winter of a primary school in a highly polluted French alpine valley2023 · 11 citations
  3. 3Sources of indoor air pollution at a New Zealand urban primary school; a case study2018 · 93 citations
  4. 4Toward configuring healthier classrooms: developing indoor environmental quality assessment indicators2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Indoor environmental quality classification of school environments by monitoring PM and CO2 concentration levels2019 · 95 citations