PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2 citationsOpen Access

Transfer learning models in the detection of pulp calcifications- A preliminary study

View Full Paper
SSShishir ShettyWTWael TalaatSASausan AlKawas

Key Points

  • To evaluate transfer learning models for detecting pulp calcifications in dental radiographs.
  • Collected 240 cropped panoramic radiographs, 120 with pulp calcifications and 120 without.
  • Preprocessed images using CLAHE and data augmentation techniques.
  • Utilized VGG16, ResNet101V2, and MobileNetV2 pre-trained models for image classification.
  • VGG16 achieved training, validation, and test accuracies of 0.80, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively.
  • VGG16 showed a precision of 0.84, a recall of 0.87, and an F1-score of 0.86.
  • Inter-rater reliability among examiners was 0.91.

Abstract

Pulp calcifications (PC) play a major role in the clinical outcome of endodontic treatment. Dentists use different radiographic modalities for detecting the presence of PCs. Transfer learning models have shown promising results with low computational resources in the detection and classification of diseases and conditions in dental radiographs. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of transfer learning models in the detection of PCs in cropped panoramic radiographs (PRs). Two calibrated examiners collected 240 cropped PR images (120 with PCs and 120 without PCs) of maxillary and/or mandibular posterior teeth. The images were preprocessed using CLAHE (Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization) and then augmented. Three pre-trained models, VGG16, ResNet101V2, and MobileNetV2, were used for classification of the images. A Fine-tuning approach was used for training the model. The inter-rater reliability among the five examiners was 0.91. VGG 16 was the best-performing model with training, validation, and test accuracies of 0.80, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively. VGG16 showed a precision of 0.84, a recall of 0.87, an F1-score of 0.86, and an AUC of 0.93. ResNet101V2 and MobileNetV2 showed test accuracies of 69% and 50%, respectively. The Transfer-learning model VGG 16 outperformed other models in the detection of PCs in cropped PRs. Due to the use of cropped PRs, the model cannot be generalized; however, future work will be aimed at attaining similar performance metrics in uncropped PRs in larger datasets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shetty et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefa3164b5133a91a3946https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2026.101462
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effective Management of Calcified Root Canals Using Static-guided Access: A Case Series2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Dental Age Estimation in Children Using Convolution Neural Network Algorithm: A Pilot Study2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Prevalence of pulp stones in Jordanian adults1998 · 107 citations
  4. 4Multi-label dental disorder diagnosis based on MobileNetV2 and swin transformer using bagging ensemble classifier2024 · 40 citations
  5. 5VGG-16 based Deep Learning Approach for Cephalometric Landmark Detection2024 · 4 citations