PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Management Science0 citations

Before the Storm: Firm Policies and Varying Recession Risk

View Full Paper
AKAli KakhbodUniversity of California, BerkeleyDLDmitry LivdanUniversity of California, BerkeleyMRMax ReppenBoston University

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how firms of different sizes adapt their policies in response to recession risk.
  • Developed a model incorporating time-varying recession risk into liquidity management and investment strategies.
  • Analyzed differences in policy responses between small and large firms during varying recession risk periods.
  • Identified that small firms are less sensitive to recession risk in their investment strategies compared to large firms.
  • Found that small firms build larger cash reserves during low recession risk, anticipating future cash flow volatility.
  • Showed that large firms defer precautionary actions until recession risk increases.

Abstract

Recession risk fluctuates substantially “before the storm,” yet little is known about how firms of different sizes adapt their policies accordingly. We embed time-varying recession risk into a model of liquidity management and investment, allowing firms to time their precautionary policies. Estimation reveals that small firms are less sensitive than large firms in their issuance, payout, and investment strategies to variations in recession risk. This is because small firms proactively build larger cash reserves relative to their current cash flow volatility during periods of low recession risk, anticipating that aggressive investment will gradually drain liquidity, grow cash flow volatility, and raise the risk of liquidation if a recession occurs. In contrast, large firms rely on robust cash flows to replenish liquidity during periods of low recession risk, deferring other precautionary actions until recession risk intensifies. These results have important implications for estimating the impact of recessions and macroprudential policy. This paper was accepted by Lukas Schmid, finance. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.08861 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kakhbod et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefc0164b5133a91a3b93https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.08861
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Payout policy through the financial crisis: The growth of repurchases and the resilience of dividends2015 · 361 citations
  2. 2Production function regressions, returns to scale, and externalities1996 · 318 citations
  3. 3LEVERAGING THE UNDERINVESTMENT PROBLEM: HOW HIGH DEBT AND MANAGEMENT SHAREHOLDINGS SOLVE THE AGENCY COSTS OF FREE CASH FLOW1992 · 24 citations
  4. 4Free Cash Flow, Issuance Costs, and Stock Prices2011 · 173 citations
  5. 5Macroeconomic Effects of Financial Shocks2012 · 1,253 citations