PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

Markedly Discordant and Rapidly Changing Hemoglobin A1c Values in a Normoglycemic Patient: A Case Report

View Full Paper
OEOsama ElkhiderOEOmer ElshaikhASAlisha Sharma

Key Points

  • This case discusses the implications of rapidly changing HbA1c values in a patient without diabetes.
  • Case report of a 31-year-old male with high HbA1c and normal fasting plasma glucose.
  • Repeat testing showed fluctuating HbA1c values over days.
  • Urine toxicology screening was conducted for substance use.
  • Initial HbA1c was 13.9% despite normal fasting glucose of 89 mg/dL.
  • Subsequent testing showed a drop to 7.5% and stabilization at 5.8%.
  • Asymptomatic patient indicated no persistent hyperglycemia; opioid use was noted.

Abstract

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reflects average glycemia over approximately two to three months and is widely used for the diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes mellitus; however, discordant results may occur due to analytical interference, altered erythrocyte turnover, or preanalytical factors. We report a 31-year-old male with no known history of diabetes who presented for routine laboratory evaluation and was found to have an HbA1c of 13.9% despite a normal fasting plasma glucose of 89 mg/dL. Repeat testing of the same sample six hours later demonstrated a decrease to 7.5%, and a simultaneously collected new sample yielded an identical value. Over subsequent days, repeated measurements across multiple samples showed further decline and eventual stabilization at 5.8%. The patient remained asymptomatic, and additional evaluation did not support persistent hyperglycemia. Urine toxicology screening was positive for opioids, and the patient reported recent use of an unidentified substance. A follow-up sample obtained after two weeks confirmed a stable HbA1c of 5.8%. The rapid intra-sample variability and subsequent normalization observed in this case are inconsistent with the known kinetics of hemoglobin glycation and strongly suggest a non-physiological mechanism, most likely assay interference. This case emphasizes the importance of verifying unexpected HbA1c results prior to clinical decision-making to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elkhider et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefd5164b5133a91a3e5ehttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.108291
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper