PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Qualification of a Protected Indigenous Group Under the Rome Statute: The Case of the Hunde People Facing Mass Crimes in Eastern DRC

View Full Paper
NPNyengo Paulin

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze the legal protection of the Hunde people under international law.
  • Legal analysis of the Rome Statute and international jurisprudence
  • Case study of the Hunde people in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Examination of systematic violence and land dispossession
  • Identified systematic violence and ethnic cleansing against the Hunde people
  • Highlighted the need for a legal framework recognizing protected group status
  • Proposed a model of social justice that includes land restitution and rehabilitation of customary structures

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal protection of the Hunde people, an indigenous community in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, through the lens of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Although this population is the target of systematic violence in the territories of Rutshuru, Masisi, and Goma, these crimes are often categorized merely as collateral war damage, thereby obscuring their identity-based and land-related dimensions. The Hunde fulfill the criteria of a "protected group" (ethnic and cultural) as defined by international jurisprudence. This research highlights a mechanism of "human persecution and land spoliation": the massacres, the assassinations of customary chiefs (Mwami), and forced displacements are not isolated acts, but rather a deliberate strategy of ethnic cleansing aimed at creating a legal vacuum to facilitate the plunder of the ancestral lands of the Hunde tribe. This research critiques the shortcomings of the current justice system, which is overly focused on individual criminal responsibility, and argues for a paradigm shift. It proposes a model of restorative social justice where the redress of damages would no longer be solely financial, but would imperatively involve the restitution of land and the rehabilitation of customary structures weakened by political maneuvers and politico-military movements. The formal recognition of protected group status is presented as the sole legal safeguard capable of preventing the social and cultural ethnocide of the Hunde in the face of cycles of violence and land dispossession targeting the Hunde tribe in the DRC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nyengo Paulin (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefef164b5133a91a4069https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20037171
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1THE QUALIFICATION OF A PROTECTED INDIGENOUS GROUP UNDER THE ROME STATUTE: THE CASE OF THE HUNDE PEOPLE FACING MASS CRIMES IN EASTERN DRC2026
  2. 2A re-conceptualisation of the Batwa's right to recognition as a minority and indigenous people in Rwanda: A human rights-based approach2024
  3. 3Theoretical Recognition of the Enforcement of Indigenous Peoples' Rights: Making a case for the Batwa in Uganda2025
  4. 4Investigating Multidirectional Violence in Eastern Congo: Owning ‘Genocide’ and Pre-judicial Atrocity2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5The Crime of Genocide Considering International Humanitarian Law2024 · 1 citations