PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Anthromusicology

View Full Paper
TGThomas GravesFilm Independent

Key Points

  • To explore the need for reframing ethnomusicology to better represent its scope and focus.
  • Analyzed the historical discourse surrounding the field of ethnomusicology.
  • Examined the implications of the prefix 'ethno-' for scholars in the field.
  • Proposed a new framework termed 'anthromusicology'.
  • Identified discomfort among scholars regarding the term 'ethnomusicology'.
  • Proposed that 'anthromusicology' encompasses a broader understanding of music's role in human life.
  • Highlighted the importance of diversity in the study of music.

Abstract

Throughout its history, the question of whether the field of ethnomusicology should be renamed, abolished, or combined with other fields has periodically re-emerged. The most common reason given for this is scholars' discomfort with the prefix "ethno-". From a lay perspective, ethnomusicology gives the immediate impression of the study of music as it relates to ethnicity or to "the Other", giving an incorrect and problematic view of what it is ethnomusicologists do. This article argues for a reframing and expansion of the field as "anthromusicology," not defined as "the study of people making music", but more broadly, as the holistic study of the place music, broadly defined, holds in human life, in all its diversity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas Graves (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbf004164b5133a91a450ehttps://doi.org/10.17613/sbae5-rjd77
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper