PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Applied Ergonomics0 citationsOpen Access

Human-automation interaction in organizations’ automation efforts

View Full Paper
LRLorenz RossmannAWAndreas WaldDRDiane Robers

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how organizations design and structure human-automation interactions during automation efforts.
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews to gather qualitative data on human-automation interaction processes.
  • Identified three iterative phases involved in automation: requirements analysis, business case development, and task design.
  • Analyzed the implicit nature of task design and decision-making regarding automation scenarios.
  • Evidence shows that firms automate through three phases: analysis, business case, and task design.
  • Human-automation interaction is not explicitly designed but occurs implicitly during scenario-building in the task design phase.
  • Task automation decisions are influenced by the business cases developed during the automation process.

Abstract

In light of the comprehensive theoretical discussion on function allocation, evidence of human-automation interaction in practice is scarce. This, however, is a prerequisite for appraising the applicability of theoretical models in practice and adjusting models if necessary. The present study explores how organizations structure and design human-automation interaction when automating. Based on data from semi-structured interviews we find a process consisting of three interlocked and iterative phases when automating: the requirements & process analysis phase, the business case phase, and the target process & task design phase. Surprisingly, companies are not consciously designing human-automation interaction, but this happens implicitly while building various scenarios in the target process & task design phase. The decision which task is automated through which scenario is taken via a business case. We conclude by proposing a shift in human-automation interaction research towards models including financial quantification as well as their interplay with additional, non-quantifiable dimensions. • Empirical evidence of human-automation interaction in practice. • Firms automate in three iterative phases: analysis, business case, and task design. • Human-automation design happens implicitly through scenario-building in task design. • Task automation decisions rely on business cases within the task design phase. • Financial and qualitative factors should be better integrated into interaction models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rossmann et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2ba98b49bacb8b347af4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2026.104803
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Interaction Between Automation and Humans in Supply Chain Planning2024
  2. 2Human-in-the-Loop Automation: Redesigning Global Business Processes to Optimize Collaboration between AI and Employees2022 · 21 citations
  3. 3Interdisciplinary industrial design strategies for human-automation interaction: Industry experts’ perspectives2024
  4. 4Designing information systems for business administration through human and computer interaction2024
  5. 5Evaluating humachine dynamics in process industry AI applications2026