PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 29, 2013Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging96 citations

MRI hemodynamic markers of progressive bicuspid aortic valve‐related aortic disease

View Full Paper
MHMichael D. HopeMSMonica SigovanSWSteve Wrenn

Structured PICO

Do MRI hemodynamic markers correlate with aortic growth in patients with bicuspid aortic valves?

P
Population
25 patients previously studied with four-dimensional (4D) Flow imaging who had at least two separate cross-sectional imaging studies to assess for aortic growth, comprising patients with bicuspid aortic valves (n=13) and tricuspid aortic valve controls without valvular disease (n=12).
I
Intervention
Four-dimensional (4D) Flow MRI assessment of ascending aorta hemodynamics (peak velocity, normalized flow displacement, maximum wall shear stress, mean wall shear stress, and minimal wall shear stress)
O
Outcome
Reproducibility of MRI aortic hemodynamic markers and their correlation with interval aortic growthsurrogate

Flow displacement measured by 4D Flow MRI is a reproducible hemodynamic marker that correlates well with aortic growth in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the reproducibility of MRI aortic hemodynamic markers and to assess their relationship to aortic growth in a cohort of patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients previously studied with four-dimensional (4D) Flow imaging who had at least two separate cross-sectional imaging studies to assess for aortic growth were included: tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) controls without valvular disease (n = 12) and patients with BAV (n = 13). Flow data from the ascending aorta was used for calculation of peak velocity, normalized flow displacement, maximum wall shear stress (WSS), mean WSS, and minimal WSS. Pearson's correlation was used to evaluate interobserver agreement, and linear regression to evaluate the correlation between the different hemodynamic markers and growth. Patient informed consent was waived by the institutional review board that approved the study. RESULTS: Peak velocity and flow displacement were very reproducible (r = 0.90-1.0 and r = 0.91-0.98, respectively). The range of WSS parameters was largely reproducible (0.47 < r < 0.96) with the greatest variability at the data extraction stage of analysis (0.47 < r < 0.85). Flow displacement best correlated with interval aortic growth (r = 0.65), peak velocity was moderately correlated (r = 0.35), but the WSS parameters did not correlate well with growth (r < 0.17). CONCLUSION: Flow displacement is a simple and reproducible hemodynamic marker that shows good correlation with aortic growth in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hope et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fcadae4f95092fbe78f4f5https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24362
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper