PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 11, 2016Clinical Chemistry398 citations

Cardiac Troponin Assays: Guide to Understanding Analytical Characteristics and Their Impact on Clinical Care

View Full Paper
FAFred S. AppleYSYader SandovalAJAllan S. Jaffe

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) determinations are fixtures in clinical practice and research. Cardiac troponin testing has been the standard of practice for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), early rule-out, risk stratification, and outcomes assessment in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and non-ACS myocardial injury. We recognize from reading the literature over the past several years how poorly understood the analytical characteristics are for cTnI and cTnT assays by laboratorians, clinicians, and scientists who use these assays. CONTENT: The purposes of this mini-review are (a) to define limit of blank, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and imprecision, (b) overview the analytical characteristics of the existing cardiac troponin assays, (c) recommend approaches to define a healthy (normal) reference population for determining the 99th percentile and the appropriate statistic to use for this calculation, (d) clarify how an assay becomes designated as "high sensitivity," and (e) provide guidance on determining delta (Δ) change values. SUMMARY: This review raises important educational information regarding cTnI and cTnT assays, their 99th percentile upper reference limits (URL) differentiated by sex, and specifically addresses high-sensitivity (hs)-assays used to measure low concentrations. Recommendations are made to help clarify the nomenclature and analytical and clinical characteristics to define hs-assays. The review also identifies challenges for the evolving implementation of hs-assays into clinical practice. It is hoped that with the introduction of these concepts, laboratorians, clinicians and researchers can develop a more unified view of how these assays should be used worldwide.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Apple et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd29291801985354490774https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.255109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation.2008 · 2,149 citations
  2. 2Diseased Skeletal Muscle2011 · 283 citations
  3. 3Counterpoint: Standardization of Cardiac Troponin I Assays Will Not Occur in My Lifetime2011 · 80 citations
  4. 4National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Characteristics and Utilization of Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes2007 · 479 citations
  5. 5Determination of 19 Cardiac Troponin I and T Assay 99th Percentile Values from a Common Presumably Healthy Population2012 · 539 citations