PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 6, 2012167 citations

Thermovote

View Full Paper
VEVarick L. EricksonACAlberto Cerpa

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Thermal comfort has traditionally been measured solely by temperature. While other methods such as Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) are available for measuring thermal comfort, the parameters required for an accurate value are overly complicated to obtain and require a great deal of sensory input. This paper proposes to bypass overly cumbersome or simplistic measures thermal comfort by bringing humans in the loop. By using humans as sensors, we can accurately adjust temperatures to improve occupant comfort. We show that occupants are more comfortable with a system that continually adjusts to thermal preference than a system that attempts to predict user comfort based on environmental factors. In addition, we also show that such a system is able to save 10.1% energy while improving the quality of service.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Erickson et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7b3bc105307ccb509dc6https://doi.org/10.1145/2422531.2422534
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A new approach for measuring predicted mean vote (PMV) and standard effective temperature (SET∗)2002 · 110 citations
  2. 2Comparison of low-energy office buildings in summer using different thermal comfort criteria2007 · 102 citations
  3. 3Predicting the desired thermal comfort conditions f or shared offices2003 · 11 citations
  4. 4Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy1992 · 6,146 citations
  5. 5Passive House sensor networks: Human centric thermal comfort concept2009 · 16 citations