PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Frontiers in Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

The application effect of the 5E-microteaching integration model in the standardized training of general practitioners

View Full Paper
LLLinjuan LiYGYuxin GuoHDHaimei Du

Key Points

  • The study evaluates the impact of a 5E microteaching model on the training of general practitioners, focusing on clinical skills and critical thinking.
  • Sixty general practice residents were randomly assigned to an experimental or control group.
  • The experimental group received the 5E microteaching model, while the control group underwent traditional teaching.
  • Outcomes were assessed using the MINI-CEX, CTDI-CV evaluations, graduation ratings, and a satisfaction questionnaire.
  • The experimental group significantly outperformed the control in all aspects of the MINI-CEX (p < 0.05).
  • CTDI-CV improvements in truth-seeking and analytical capabilities were also significant (all p < 0.05).
  • Satisfaction scores were higher in the experimental group (96.67% vs. 73.33%, p = 0.030).

Abstract

Background This study evaluated the effectiveness of a training model combining 5E teaching and microteaching in improving clinical abilities, critical thinking, and learning satisfaction of general practitioners (GPs) in standardized training. Methods Sixty general practice residents undergoing standardized training at Yan’an University Affiliated Hospital (Sept 2023-Sept 2025) were enrolled to minimize sampling bias, randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group received 5E microteaching (participation, exploration, explanation, expansion, evaluation) with microteaching for skill documentation and feedback; the control group received traditional teaching. Group differences were assessed using the MINI-CEX, CTDI-CV, graduation evaluations, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Results No significant baseline differences (sex, age) validated randomization. The experimental group outperformed the control in all MINI-CEX dimensions (all p 0.05), showed significant CTDI-CV improvements in truth-seeking, openness, analytical capability, systematicity, self-confidence, curiosity (all p 0.05; cognitive maturity unchanged), higher scores in theory, medical record writing, operational skills (all p 0.001), and higher satisfaction (96.67% vs. 73.33%, p = 0.030). Conclusion The “5E-Microteaching (integrated model)” effectively improves clinical competencies, critical thinking, and satisfaction among general practice residents, providing an empirical framework for competency-based innovation in general medical education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7cd4bfa21ec5bbf05b8bhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1812102
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper