PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026The AAPS Journal1 citationsOpen Access

Raltegravir Plasma Exposure: A Machine Learning-Based Model for its Prediction Using Limited Sampling Strategy

MTMatheus de Lucca ThomazUniversidade de São PauloKAKathley Lanna Rezende de AzevedoUniversidade de São PauloTPTiago Antunes PazUniversidade de São Paulo

Key Points

  • The study aims to create and validate a machine learning model to predict raltegravir exposure using limited sampling.
  • Machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, Random Forest, GLMNet, SVM) were trained on pharmacokinetic profiles generated by Monte Carlo simulation.
  • Data was divided into training (75%) and test (25%) sets, evaluating combinations of sampling times.
  • Model performance was measured by root mean square error in cross-validation and tested on independent datasets.
  • XGBoost using concentrations at 0.5, 2, and 4 hours achieved the best performance, with bias/RMSE of 0.8%/8.7% in the test set.
  • In independent simulations, model accuracy was 1.9%/14.3%.
  • Real patient data showed decreased performance at 5.0%/24.1%, indicating caution in generalizing these findings.

Abstract

Abstract Recent studies have applied machine learning (ML)-based limited sampling strategies (LSS) to predict drug exposure (AUC), achieving low prediction error and performance comparable to or better than multiple linear regression and population pharmacokinetics LSS. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based limited sampling strategy capable of predicting raltegravir (RAL) exposure. Four machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, Random Forest, GLMNet, and SVM) were trained using pharmacokinetic profiles generated via Monte Carlo simulation from a population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) model. Data were divided into training (75%) and test (25%) sets. All possible combinations of sampling times, pairs and triplets, in steady-state, up to 12 h post-dose were evaluated. Model performance was assessed by the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) in the cross-validation, and the best performing model was evaluated in the test set and externally validated using simulated PK profiles from an independent POPPK model and patient data from a clinical study. XGBoost trained with concentrations at 0.5, 2, and 4 h showed the best predictive performance. The model achieved excellent accuracy in the test set (bias/RMSE: 0.8%/8.7%) and in the independent simulation (1.9%/14.3%). Performance decreased in real patient data (5.0%/24.1%), highlighting the need for caution when extrapolating predictions to populations whose characteristics differ from those represented in the training datasets. A machine learning model using only three sampling timepoints has been developed and validated in different datasets, enabling accurate estimation of RAL AUC₀-₁₂. This approach provides a tool for pharmacokinetic and PK/PD studies and reduces intensive sampling need in clinical settings. Graphical Abstract

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomaz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e23bfa21ec5bbf065bchttps://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-026-01248-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper