PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026European Stroke Journal0 citations

Abstract Number: Esoc2026a1822 Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischaemic Stroke in Patients With Concomitant Active Cancer - A Multicenter Cohort Study From the Eva-Trisp Collaboration

View Full Paper
MWMalin WoockGCGianluca CostamagnaMHMirjam R. Heldner

Key Points

  • To compare outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in stroke patients with and without active cancer.
  • Multicenter cohort analysis from the EVA-TRISP registry (11 centres, 8 countries, 2014−2023)
  • Used multivariable regressions and propensity score weighting to analyze outcomes
  • Measured early neurological improvement, recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, functional independence, and death rates.
  • Early neurological improvement was similar (47.5% vs 45.3%, wOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.87−1.26)
  • Active cancer patients had higher sICH rates (7.2% vs 4.0%, wOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.30−2.70)
  • Lower functional independence (30.1% vs 44.0%, wOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45−0.69) and higher death rates (42.8% vs 22.3%, wOR 2.60, 95% CI 1.14−3.17) at 3 months.

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Patients with active cancer are at increased risk of ischaemic stroke. Smaller studies of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in such stroke patients indicate worse clinical outcomes despite similar recanalization rates as patients without active cancer. However, evidence from larger multicentre cohorts is lacking. Methods We used data from the EVA-TRISP registry comprising stroke patients treated with EVT (11 centres, 8 countries, 2014−2023). Using multivariable regressions adjusting for prognostic variables and propensity score weighting we compared patients with active cancer to patients without cancer regarding early neurological improvement (ENI), defined as NIHSS improvement of -4 points or score 0−1 at 24h after EVT, successful recanalization (mTICI 2b−3), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale mRS 0−2) and death at 3 months. Results We included 526 EVT patients with active cancer and 6,894 without cancer. ENI (47.5 vs 45.3%, weighted OR wOR 1.05, 95%CI 0.87−1.26) and successful recanalization (78.8 vs 70.4%, wOR 0.86, 95%CI 0.68-1.08) did not differ significantly. However, patients with active cancer showed higher rates of sICH (7.2 vs 4.0%, wOR 1.88, 95%CI 1.30−2.70), less functional independence at 3 months (30.1 vs 44.0%, wOR 0.56, 95%CI 0.45−0.69) and higher death rates (42.8 vs 22.3%, wOR 2.60, 95%CI 1.14−3.17). Conclusions In this large observational multicentre study, recanalization rates and ENI after EVT were comparable in stroke patients with and without active cancer. Still, worse 3−month outcomes in patients with active cancer may have to be considered in EVT-decision making in such patients. Conflict of interest Malin Woock: nothing to disclose, Katarina Jood: nothing to disclose, Turgut Tatlisumak: nothing to disclose, Gianluca Costamagna: nothing to disclose, Christian Nolde: nothing to disclose, Mirjam Heldner: nothing to disclose, Nicolas Martinez-Majander: nothing to disclose, Ronen Leker: nothing to disclose, Anton Schmick: nothing to disclose and Joâo Pedro Marto: nothing to disclose.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Woock et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e23bfa21ec5bbf06613https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.856
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper