PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026npj Acoustics0 citationsOpen Access

Modeling head- and pinna-related transfer functions using boundary elements and finite differences with volume penalization

AHArne B. HölterMLMathias LemkeSWStefan Weinzierl

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop and compare methods for simulating head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) in sound transmission.
  • Compared finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) with fast multipole boundary element method (fmBEM) for HRTF modeling.
  • Validated models with analytical solutions for diffraction and measurements of the outer ear.
  • Analyzed grid requirements for representing rigid walls in FDTD simulations.
  • FDTD and fmBEM methods show good agreement with analytical solutions; differences were close to just noticeable differences.
  • FDTD is better for interior problems, but has higher computational costs and can use range extrapolation methods for broader applicability.

Abstract

Abstract Head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) describe the free-field sound transmission to the ears and are fundamental to most virtual and augmented reality systems. However, measuring HRTFs is time-consuming and error-prone, making wave-based simulations of HRTFs an appealing alternative. This paper compares a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method incorporating a volume penalization approach for modeling rigid boundaries with an established fast multipole boundary element method (fmBEM). The simulation models are verified by comparing them with the analytical solution for diffraction around a rigid sphere. Additionally, the grid requirements for representing rigid walls in the FDTD framework are analyzed. The models are validated using measurements of an outer ear and are compared in simulations of a complete head. Both methods show good agreement with analytical solutions and measured data close to the order of magnitude of just noticeable differences. Due to its higher computational cost, the FDTD method is particularly suitable for interior problems and smaller volumes. However, its applicability can be extended using range extrapolation methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hölter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e90bfa21ec5bbf06d5dhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44384-026-00052-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems1987 · 1,162 citations
  2. 2Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane1974 · 475 citations
  3. 3Characteristic decomposition methods for the multidimensional euler equations2006 · 63 citations
  4. 4Spatial Hearing1996 · 756 citations
  5. 5Boundary element method calculation of individual head-related transfer function. I. Rigid model calculation2001 · 188 citations