PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Feminist Theory0 citationsOpen Access

Too Migrant, Too Muslim, Too Loud : Contradictions of belonging and feminist refusal in post-9/11 white settler-colonial Australia

View Full Paper
MWMahin Wahla

Key Points

  • The article seeks to interrogate migrant belonging within the context of settler colonialism in Australia, revealing how recognition can reinforce exclusion.
  • Close reading of Senator Mehreen Faruqi's memoir 'Too Migrant, Too Muslim, Too Loud'.
  • Analysis of Indigenous critiques and postcolonial feminist and critical race scholarship.
  • Examination of the relationship between practices of recognition and settler sovereignty.
  • Faruqi's political visibility is framed as progress while her identity is marked as excessive.
  • The article argues that belonging is conditional and reflects the ongoing processes of settler colonialism.
  • Faruqi's loudness is interpreted as a feminist practice of refusal, highlighting the complexities of Australianness.

Abstract

This article interrogates the contradictions of migrant belonging in post-9/11 Australia by situating them within the ongoing conditions of settler colonialism. Through a close reading of Senator Mehreen Faruqi's memoir, Too Migrant, Too Muslim, Too Loud , it argues that practices of recognition and inclusion function less as remedies to racial exclusion than as techniques through which settler sovereignty is stabilised. Faruqi's political visibility is celebrated as evidence of multicultural progress even as her speech, faith and presence are repeatedly marked as excessive – too migrant, too Muslim, too loud – revealing belonging as conditional, evaluative and perpetually provisional. Drawing on Indigenous critiques of recognition alongside postcolonial feminist and critical race scholarship, the article reframes migrant belonging as an epistemic problem in which inclusion into the settler state is misrecognised as justice, thereby displacing demands for decolonisation on stolen land. Against this backdrop, Faruqi's loudness is read as a feminist practice of refusal that exposes the affective and disciplinary economies through which Australianness is conferred and withdrawn. Rather than resolving the contradictions of belonging, the article holds them open to demonstrate the limits of migrancy and recognition as frameworks for justice in settler-colonial contexts. Anchored in Australia, it offers an account of migrant refusal that is attentive to the specificity of settler colonialism while illuminating the broader post-9/11 governance of difference in liberal democracies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mahin Wahla (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7ec6bfa21ec5bbf070e2https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001261446400
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper