PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Journal of Business Logistics3 citationsOpen Access

Electronic Logging Device Enforcement, Leased Owner‐Operator Use, and Carrier Size: Complex Interactive Effects on Hours‐of‐Service Violations

View Full Paper
JMJason MillerRHRowan HilendKSKeith Skowronski

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how the enforcement of electronic logging devices affects trucking compliance with hours-of-service rules, particularly among leased owner-operators and larger carriers.
  • Analyzed inspection data for for-hire motor carriers from January 2013 to December 2023.
  • Employed econometric models to test the hypotheses on compliance changes.
  • Examined the interactions between deterrence theory and regulatory compliance theory.
  • Leased owner-operators experienced greater reductions in hours-of-service violations with stricter ELD enforcement.
  • Larger carriers saw more pronounced compliance changes due to the three-way interaction between enforcement, operator type, and carrier size.
  • Findings suggest important implications for understanding compliance dynamics in trucking regulations.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ensuring trucking companies comply with hours‐of‐service (HOS) rules is an ongoing challenge faced by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. This research examines heterogeneity in how trucking firms' compliance with HOS rules changed in response to a multistage regulatory intervention that required most large commercial trucks operating in the United States to install electronic logging devices (ELDs). We extend theory by first drawing on deterrence theory to explain why carriers that utilize subcontractor truck drivers—called leased owner‐operators (LOOs)—saw greater reductions in HOS violations as the ELD mandate was more strictly enforced. We then augment deterrence theory with principles from regulatory compliance theory to explain why this two‐way interaction will be more pronounced for larger carriers, suggesting a three‐way interaction. We test our hypotheses using the population of inspections across for‐hire motor carriers from January 2013 through December 2023. Results from fitting a series of econometric models corroborate our predictions. These findings suggest important boundary conditions for existing theory regarding LOOs' compliance with HOS rules and help shed light on the complex interplay of forces that generate heterogeneity in compliance efforts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miller et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7ee0bfa21ec5bbf07289https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.70073
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Men at Work…Unsafely: Gender Differences in Compliance with Safety Regulations in the Trucking Industry2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2EXPRESS: Property Rights Restrictions and Self-Employed Workers: Evidence from For-Hire Owner-Operators in U.S. Trucking2024
  3. 3Integrating Autonomous Trucks into Human-Centric Operations: A Path to Safer and More Energy-Efficient Road Transport2025
  4. 4Owner-operator experience and violations in trucking: The mixed role of perceived justice2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5The charger location problem with routing and driver working hours for long-haul electric heavy-duty trucks2026