PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026European Stroke Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Abstract Number: Esoc2026a121 Breakthrough Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Worse Functional Outcomes and Higher Recurrence Rates Compared to Newly Discovered Atrial Fibrillation

View Full Paper
GFGiulio de FioreMOMarta OliveFRFederica Rizzo

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare health outcomes between breakthrough stroke patients on direct oral anticoagulants and those with newly discovered atrial fibrillation.
  • Retrospective cohort study using Vall d'Hebron University Hospital stroke registry from 2020-2025.

Structured PICO

Does breakthrough stroke on DOACs worsen functional outcomes and increase recurrence compared to newly discovered atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischemic stroke?

P
Population
458 patients (229 propensity-matched pairs) with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation, selected from 778 AF-related strokes among 9,000 stroke admissions.
I
Intervention
Breakthrough stroke (known atrial fibrillation on direct oral anticoagulants)
C
Comparator
Newly discovered atrial fibrillation
O
Outcome
90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift and functional independence (mRS 0-2)hard clinical

Ischemic stroke occurring despite DOAC therapy for atrial fibrillation is a high-risk phenotype associated with worse functional outcomes, higher mortality, and increased recurrence compared to stroke in newly discovered atrial fibrillation.

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Despite anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), some atrial fibrillation (AF) patients still experience ischemic stroke. Understanding whether breakthrough stroke (BS) represents therapeutic failure or identifies higher-risk phenotypes is essential for optimizing secondary prevention. We compared outcomes between breakthrough stroke patients on DOACs versus newly discovered AF patients. Methods Retrospective cohort study using Vall d'Hebron University Hospital stroke registry (2020-2025). Patients with acute ischemic stroke and AF were classified as breakthrough stroke (known AF on DOACs) or newly discovered AF. Propensity score matching (1:1) adjusted for age, sex, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale, baseline NIHSS, and reperfusion therapies. Primary outcomes: 90-day mRS shift and functional independence (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcomes: mortality and 1-year recurrence using Fine-Gray competing risk regression. Results Among 9,000 stroke admissions, 778 had AF-related stroke. After matching, 229 pairs were analyzed. Breakthrough stroke patients showed significantly worse mRS distribution (common OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.24-2.39; p=0.001) and lower functional independence (39.7% vs 54.1%; RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.60-0.90; p0.001). Breakthrough patients had higher 90-day mortality (7.9% vs 3.1%; RR 3.60; 95% CI 1.36-9.53; p=0.011) and five-fold increased 1-year recurrence risk (HR 3.59; 95% CI 1.19-10.86; p=0.024). All primary outcomes survived multiple testing corrections. Conclusions Breakthrough stroke patients on DOACs have significantly worse functional outcomes, higher mortality, and increased recurrence compared to newly discovered AF patients. These findings identify breakthrough stroke as a high-risk phenotype requiring intensified secondary prevention strategies. Conflict of interest Giulio Fiore: Nothing to disclose, Marta Olive: Nothing to disclose, Federica Rizzo: Nothing to disclose, Claudia Patricia Meza Burgos: Nothing to disclose, David Rodriguez-Luna: Nothing to disclose, Noelia Rodriguez-Villatoro: Nothing to disclose, Alvaro Garcia-Tornel: Nothing to disclose, Adriano Bonura: Nothing to disclose, Marián Muchada: Nothing to disclose, Carlos A. Molina: Nothing to disclose, Marta Rubiera: Nothing to disclose, Jorge Pagola: Nothing to disclose Figure 1 - belongs to Results Table 1 - belongs to Conclusions

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fiore et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f0dbfa21ec5bbf07619https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.193
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2404 CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL IMPACT OF THERAPEUTIC DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANT LEVELS IN BREAKTHROUGH ISCHEMIC STROKE2026
  2. 2ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A681 CHARACTERISTICS AND CAUSAL FACTORS OF BREAKTHROUGH ISCHEMIC STROKE DESPITE ONGOING ORAL ANTICOAGULATION IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: THE ASPERA-R STUDY2026
  3. 3ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026LB83 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES AFTER ISCHEMIC STROKE IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION UNDER ORAL ANTICOAGULATION2026
  4. 4ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A9 COMPETING ETIOLOGIES AND OUTCOMES AFTER BREAKTHROUGH ISCHEMIC STROKE IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ON ORAL ANTICOAGULATION: RESULTS FROM THE ASPERA-R STUDY2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026LB72 CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC STROKE DESPITE ORAL ANTICOAGULATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION2026