PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 20260 citations

Diagnostic reference levels determined based on clinical indications for adult computed tomography at the Mohammed VI University Hospital Centre in Marrakech, Morocco.

View Full Paper
BABoulanouar AbdelaazizKHKhajmi HassanJHJalal HichamSup de Co Marrakech

Key Points

  • The study aims to establish diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) based on clinical indications for CT scans in adult patients.
  • Collected dose values and CT acquisition parameters from 2400 adult patients over 16 years old
  • Assessed 22 clinical indications across four anatomical regions: head, chest, abdomen-pelvis, and chest-abdomen-pelvis
  • Applied a non-parametric test to analyze dose distributions and determined statistical significance at p < 0.01.
  • Significant variability in CTDIvol and DLP across different clinical indications for head, chest, and abdominal-pelvis (p < 0.01)
  • For chest-abdomen-pelvis scans, DLP showed significant differences (p < 0.01) while CTDIvol did not (p > 0.01)
  • Most DRL CI values were higher than those reported in France, Europe, America, and Africa.

Abstract

This study aimed to establish the DRLs according to clinical indications (DRL CI) for adult patients in the three CT units of the Mohammed VI University Hospital Centre in Marrakesh (Med VI UHCM). Dose values and CT acquisition parameters were collected from 2.400 adult patients over the age of 16 who underwent CT scans in at the Med VI UHCM. This approach enabled us to assess 22 distinct clinical indications, spread across the four anatomical regions of the head, chest, abdomen-pelvis (AP), and chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP). The DRL CI for each indication were established as the third quartile values of the CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) distributions. To ensure a comparative assessment of dose distributions, a non-parametric test was applied to analyze the data according to the different indications for each anatomical region. Statistical significance was defined as p 0.01). The DRL CI observed for most indications was generally higher than that reported in France, Europe, America, and Africa. Optimization of radiation exposure in CT in adults should focus on DRLs based on clinical indications rather than anatomical DRLs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abdelaaziz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f0dbfa21ec5bbf07799https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2026014/pdf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper