PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Micro-Ethnographic Study of Interdisciplinary Collaboration for Good Death Among Home-based End-stage Clients in Japan

View Full Paper
CWChise WadaAFAtsuko FukudaHyogo University of Health SciencesYKYoko KatayamaTokyo University of Agriculture

Key Points

  • This study aims to clarify the cultural norms involved in interdisciplinary collaboration that supports a 'good death' for home-based end-stage clients in Japan.
  • Micro-ethnographic design based on Roper and Shapira’s framework.
  • Fieldwork and interviews conducted with 15 team members caring for three home-based end-stage clients.
  • Identified twelve embedded themes across four care phases: relational grounding, cultural integration, consensus and closure, and relational continuity.
  • Found that interdisciplinary collaboration harmonized with daily life and reflected individual quality of life.
  • Highlighted the importance of shared concerns and learning within the cultural community of clients and families.

Abstract

Background: Aging and chronic illness increase demand for home-based end-of-life care, yet in Japan interdisciplinary collaboration for a good death remains underexplored as structure and cultural practice. This study aimed to clarify cultural norms embodied in interdisciplinary collaboration supporting a “good death” for clients receiving home-based end-of-life care. Methods: A micro-ethnographic design based on Roper and Shapira’s framework was applied. Data came from fieldwork and interviews with 15 team members caring for three home-based end-stage clients. Results: Twelve embedded themes were identified across four culturally symbolic care phases. 1) Relational grounding: person-centered team formation and value recognition; family alignment and consensus building. 2) Cultural integration: living well in the present with anticipatory care; family-centered support and shared responsibility; resource use and professional collaboration. 3) Consensus and closure: individualized symptom relief and end-of-life education; shared decision-making and value-based care; family-centering of anticipatory grief care; preserving everyday life and personal identity; reflective team practices and rituals of closure. 4) Relational continuity: legacy recognition and affirmation of end-of-life experiences; grief support and professional reflection. Conclusions: Interdisciplinary collaboration enabling a good death harmonized with daily life, reflected individual life quality, and formed cultural community where clients and families shared concerns, learned, and lived together.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wada et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f4fbfa21ec5bbf07badhttps://doi.org/10.24546/0100503597
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper