PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 20260 citations

Phenomenological Cognitivism: Integrating Phenomenological Analyses with Neurocognitive Mechanisms

View Full Paper
JCJacopo ColelliMMMassimo MarraffaDPDavide Perrotta

Key Points

  • The study aims to expand cognitive science by integrating phenomenological analysis with neurocognitive mechanisms to clarify cognitive dynamics.
  • Presents a pluralistic model for explaining cognitive capacities through phenomenological and neurocognitive integration.
  • Illustrates the framework using examples of inhibition, differentiating motor from mental aspects.
  • Describes structured analyses of experience compatible with computational and biological models.
  • Demonstrates how phenomenological functional analysis reveals distinctions in representation and function that traditional methods overlook.
  • Shows that integrating phenomenology with neurocognitive mechanisms broadens cognitive modeling scope.
  • Identifies new epistemic constraints that facilitate empirical research into cognitive dynamics.

Abstract

This paper proposes a pluralistic model of explanation that expands the epistemological foundations of cognitive science by integrating phenomenological analysis into the framework of neurocognitive mechanisms. We endorse the neurocognitive approach, which accounts for cognitive capacities as higher-level aspects exhibited by a multilevel computing mechanism- namely the brain. Building on this foundation, we argue that phenomenological functional analysis – understood as constitutive analyses of cognitive dynamics- adds a complementary level that can clarify the internal structure of cognitive capacities. Phenomenology, in this sense, provides epistemic constraints that help scaffold empirical research by revealing how capacities are enacted across different experiential layers. We introduce phenomenological cognitivism as a framework for functionally decomposing experience into constitutive operations and representational structures, offering descriptions that remain compatible with computational and biological modeling. Rather than appealing to qualitative or first-person content, this approach formulates structured analyses of experience that support formal integration. In the final section, we illustrate this proposal with a pluralistic model of inhibition, distinguishing motor from mental inhibition. We show how phenomenological functional analysis reveals representational and functional distinctions overlooked at behavioral or computational levels. This pluralistic framework thus broadens the scope of cognitive modeling by embedding neurocognitive mechanisms within conceptual richness of phenomenological analyses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Colelli et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f4fbfa21ec5bbf07c97https://doi.org/10.30460/118611
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Deep computational neurophenomenology: a methodological framework for investigating the how of experience2025 · 12 citations
  2. 2Deep computational neurophenomenology: A methodological framework for investigating the how of experience2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3Reframing biological models of mental disorders: phenomenology and methodological pluralism2024
  4. 4Coupling First-Person Cognitive Research With Neurophilosophy and Enactivism: An Outline of Arguments2024
  5. 5Mind, Brain, and Being-in-the-World: The Resonance-Inference Model as a Neuro-Phenomenological Answer to Dualism2025