PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

A novel hybrid NSGA-III and machine learning framework for modeling wheat yield variability using climatic, edaphic, and nutritional drivers

View Full Paper
MJMohsen JahanMBMohammad BannayanMNMehdi Nassiri-Mahallati

Key Points

  • This research aims to predict wheat yield by developing a hybrid framework using climatic, edaphic, and nutritional factors.
  • Developed a hybrid model combining NSGA-III and machine learning techniques.
  • Utilized datasets from 2004 to 2023, containing 47 variables from 17 counties in Razavi Khorasan Province.
  • Performed feature selection using Mutual Information, Recursive Feature Elimination, and Stacking Regressor with LightGBM and Deep Neural Network.
  • Achieved a test-set R2 of 0.44 with the optimal feature subset identifying significant yield drivers.
  • SHAP analysis indicated that regional heterogeneity has a dominant impact on yield variation.
  • The model effectively characterizes a considerable portion of yield variability and aids in decision-making for agriculture.

Abstract

Abstract Accurate prediction of crop yield remains a critical research priority due to the increasing vulnerability of agricultural systems to climate change and the growing need for food security. In this study, we developed a hybrid modeling framework to predict irrigated wheat yield in Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran, using long-term (2004–2023) climatic, edaphic, and nutritional datasets comprising 47 variables collected across 17 counties. After preprocessing, feature selection was performed using an integrated approach combining Mutual Information (MI), Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and the advanced NSGA-III multi-objective optimization algorithm. Final yield prediction was conducted with a Stacking Regressor meta-learner incorporating LightGBM (LGBM) and a Deep Neural Network (DNN). The optimal subset of 10 features—Tmin, TS, K, Silt, EC, HCO₃, Mg, PrecOC, AIClay, and a regional indicator variable (countyₜe) —achieved a test-set R 2 of 0. 44, reflecting a moderate yet meaningful level of explained variance given the multidimensional, nonlinear, and environmentally heterogeneous nature of the wheat production system. SHAP (SHapley Additive Explanations) analysis further highlighted the dominant influence of regional heterogeneity alongside complex interactions among climatic, soil, and nutritional factors. While the model does not capture all sources of variability, the results demonstrate that this hybrid optimization–learning pipeline reliably characterizes a substantial portion of wheat yield variation and offers a practical decision-support tool for site-specific management and climate adaptation planning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jahan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f65bfa21ec5bbf07edehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48918-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An interdisciplinary machine learning-based approach for predicting corn grain yield under biofertilizer applications2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Integrating Crop Modeling and Machine Learning for the Improved Prediction of Dryland Wheat Yield2024 · 16 citations
  3. 3A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Field Scale Wheat Yield Prediction2025
  4. 4Machine-Learning-Based Multi-Site Corn Yield Prediction Integrating Agronomic and Meteorological Data2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Improved Winter Wheat Yield Estimation by Combining Remote Sensing Data, Machine Learning, and Phenological Metrics2024 · 20 citations