PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026European Stroke Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Abstract Number: Esoc2026a521 Association Between Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Increased Cerebral Microbleeds: A Longitudinal Brain Health Screening Cohort Study in Japan

View Full Paper
SIShuhei IkedaYYYusuke YakushijiMCMasaaki Chiku

Key Points

  • The study investigates the relationship between lipid-lowering therapy and cerebral microbleed progression in middle-aged individuals with dyslipidemia.
  • Retrospective analysis of individuals with dyslipidemia undergoing brain MRI scans between 2018 and 2024.
  • Utilized inverse probability of treatment weighting and Poisson regression to analyze data and estimate incidence rates.
  • Included 2,350 participants with a median follow-up of 32.7 months, evaluating CMB progression as primary outcome.
  • Lipid-lowering therapy users exhibited a higher risk of CMB progression with an adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) of 2.14 (95% CI, 1.07–4.30).
  • CMB progression showed an absolute risk increase of 0.70% over 3 years (95% CI, 0.16%–1.74%).
  • No significant associations found between LLT and other small vessel disease markers.

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims The association between lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and cerebral microbleed (CMB) progression remains uncertain, particularly in middle-aged primary prevention populations. We examined the longitudinal relationship between LLT and CMB progression in a large Japanese brain health screening cohort. Methods We retrospectively analyzed adults with dyslipidemia and no prior stroke who underwent ≥2 brain MRI scans between January 2018 and December 2024. CMB burden was categorized by lesion count (0, 1, 2–5, 6–10, or ≥11). The primary outcome was CMB progression, defined as new CMBs or a shift to a higher CMB burden category. Secondary outcomes were progression of other cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) markers. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting and Poisson regression to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) and 3-year adjusted absolute risk differences. Results Of 65,454 screened individuals, 2,350 were included (median age 54 years; 42.8% women); 1,006 (42.8%) were LLT users. Over a median follow-up of 32.7 months, LLT use was associated with higher risk of CMB progression (aIRR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.07–4.30). LLT use was not associated with progression of white matter hyperintensities, perivascular spaces, or lacunes. The 3-year adjusted absolute risk differences for CMB progression was 0.70% (95% CI, 0.16%–1.74%). Conclusions In this Japanese primary prevention cohort, LLT was associated with CMB progression but not with other SVD markers. Although the absolute excess risk was small, individualized risk–benefit assessment may be warranted when prescribing LLT to middle-aged adults with dyslipidemia. Conflict of interest Dr. Ikeda, Dr. Yakushiji, Dr. Chiku, Dr. Tomimoto, and Dr. Ikawa report no disclosures. Ryuji Kawata is affiliated with the Department of Smart Brain Screening, EUCALIA, Inc.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ikeda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f65bfa21ec5bbf07ee3https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.332
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper