What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to explore the intersection of sport, social theory, and ethics while integrating AI safety perspectives.

synapse

⌘+K

synapse

⌘+K

May 8, 2026Open Access

AUGMANITAI Concept-Mining Waves 2+3 — Sport / Social-Theory / Ethics + AI-Safety Lens Reports

Key Points

This research aims to explore the intersection of sport, social theory, and ethics while integrating AI safety perspectives.
Analyzed 17 concept-mining reports categorized into D-cluster, E-cluster, and F-cluster.
Focused on neologisms and methodological transferability between sport-coaching and human-AI interaction.
Employed a scholarly perspective for strict-Wissenschaft interpretation.
Identified field-specific concepts in sport, social theory, and ethics using a systematic framework.
Highlighted methodological parallels between sport coaching and AI interactions.
Proposed new insights into ethical considerations related to AI in the context of sport and society.

Abstract

Restricted bundle of 17 concept-mining reports (Waves 2 + 3) covering: D-cluster (Sport + Tacit Knowledge + Expertise) - D31 Sportwiss, D37 Tacit, D38 Expertise, D40 Tennis-Coach; E-cluster (Social Theory) - E41 Bourdieu, E42 Luhmann, E43 Foucault, E45 Anthropologist, E46 Historian, E47 Political Theorist, E48 Geopolitik, E49 Strategic Theorist, E50 Network Theorist; F-cluster (Ethics + Safety) - F51 Ethicist Applied, F60 AI Safety; W3 follow-ups - F51 Ethicist Safety Charter, F60 AI Safety. Each lens surfaces field-specific neologisms, methodological transferability between sport-coaching and human-AI interaction, social-theoretic anchoring of AUGMANITAI categories. Strict-Wissenschaft, scholarly-perspective interpretation only.

AUGMANITAI Concept-Mining Waves 2+3 — Sport / Social-Theory / Ethics + AI-Safety Lens Reports

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study