PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Communication Research0 citationsOpen Access

Angry and Alerted, Happy and Informed? An Experience Sampling Study on the Relationship Between Sentiment, Affect, and Attention Toward Campaign Communication

View Full Paper
LOLukas OttoFTFabian ThomasMMMichaela Maier

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the relationship between emotional reactions and attentional processes in response to political campaign communication.
  • Conducted a mobile experience sampling study during the 40 days before the 2021 German federal election.
  • Participants reported their emotional reactions and attentional focus after encountering campaign communication.
  • Analyzed between-person and within-person associations between affect and attention.
  • Negative affect and positive affect were associated with attentional processes.
  • Happiness was linked to a broadened attentional focus.
  • Campaign interest was related to attentional focus rather than emotional responses.

Abstract

This study examines how emotional reactions to campaign communication relate to attentional processes and, ultimately, to general interest in a political campaign. Drawing on appraisal theories of emotion and the broaden-and-build theory, we argue that emotional responses to political communication play a central role in shaping different forms of attention and elaboration. Specifically, emotions may foster a narrow attentional focus directed at the stimulus itself or a broader attentional orientation characterized by a willingness to seek additional information. To test these assumptions, we conducted a mobile experience sampling study during the 40 days preceding the 2021 German federal election. Participants repeatedly reported the perceived sentiment of campaign communication, their emotional reactions while encountering it, and their attentional focus toward political information immediately after exposure to campaign communication. Between-person analyses indicate that both negative affect (particularly anger) and positive affect are associated with attentional processes, while happiness is specifically linked to a broadened attentional focus. At the within-person level, both negative and positive emotions predicted momentary attentional focus. Campaign interest, however, was related to (situational) attention rather than to affective processes. We conclude by discussing the role of positivity and positive affect in research on political media effects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Otto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd8021bfa21ec5bbf087e6https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502261443864
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Beyond a Negativity Bias: Explaining the Consumption of Positive and Negative Political Information Using WebTracking and Experience Sampling Data2025
  2. 2Comparative Sentiment Analysis of Campaign and Third-Party Communications in the 2024 U.S. Elections2026
  3. 3Attitudes or Emotions as News Compasses? Comparing Attitudinal and Emotional Guidance in Selecting News About Migration2026
  4. 4From Selective Exposure to Mobilization: Partisan Media, Polarization, and Voting Behaviors2025
  5. 5The Myth of the Angry American Voter: The Role of Positive Affect and Political Ideology on Young Adults’ Political, Religious, and Civic Engagement and Voting Intentions in 20242024