PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026BMJ Open0 citationsOpen Access

Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the King’s Stool Chart in patients receiving enteral nutrition

View Full Paper
GWGuandong WangHDHao DouHWHaibo Wang

Key Points

  • This study aims to translate and validate the Chinese King’s Stool Chart for enteral nutrition patients in nursing practice.
  • Descriptive cross-sectional study in ICU involving 144 participants receiving enteral nutrition.
  • Translation involved forward translation, synthesis, back-translation, and expert review.
  • Psychometric evaluation included content, construct, concurrent validity, and inter-rater reliability assessment.
  • Content validity indices ranged from 0.95 to 1.00, indicating excellent validity.
  • Sensitivity rates for stool weight categorization were above 89%, showcasing the chart's effectiveness.
  • The kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability was substantial at 0.735.

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Chinese version of the King’s Stool Chart among patients receiving enteral nutrition for use in nursing practice. Design This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Setting This study was conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary hospital in Henan Province, China. Participants A total of 144 patients receiving enteral nutrition were included. Methods This study was conducted in two phases. Phase I involved the translation and cultural adaptation of the King’s Stool Chart using established methodologies, including forward translation, synthesis, back-translation and expert review. Phase II comprised psychometric evaluation with 144 patients receiving enteral nutrition. The Chinese version of the King’s Stool Chart was used to assess stool frequency, consistency, weight and the daily total score. Validity was tested through content, construct and concurrent validity, while inter-rater reliability was assessed using the kappa coefficient. Results The Chinese version of the King’s Stool Chart demonstrated excellent content validity, with item-level indices ranging from 0.95 to 1.00. Construct validity was supported by the ability of the Chinese version of the King’s Stool Chart to differentiate between clinical subgroups with varying stool characteristics. Sensitivity rates for stool weight categorisation were above 89%, and substantial inter-rater reliability (kappa=0.735) was observed. The daily total score was effective in identifying patients at risk for diarrhoea, with significant differences observed among clinical subgroups. Diarrhoea classification, using a threshold of ≥15 points, showed strong construct validity. Conclusions Within the scope of this single-centre sample, the Chinese version of the King’s Stool Chart demonstrates acceptable validity and substantial to excellent inter-rater reliability for assessing stool frequency, consistency, weight and diarrhoea classification in enterally fed ICU patients in China. These psychometric properties provide preliminary support for its use in routine nursing practice for gastrointestinal function monitoring in ICU settings. Further multicentre and large-sample studies are required to verify its external validity and generalisability to broader Chinese-speaking populations and non-ICU clinical settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd8021bfa21ec5bbf08839https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109693
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper