PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Intensive Care Medicine – Paediatric and Neonatal0 citationsOpen Access

Development and validation of a diagnostic model for late-onset neonatal sepsis using the haematological profile: a retrospective cohort study

EHEmily HydeJSJanno SchoutenJSJarob Saker

Key Points

  • The aim is to create and validate the Neonatal Intensive Care Infection Score (NICIS) for diagnosing late-onset neonatal sepsis based on haematological profiles.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study with neonates admitted to a NICU over one year.
  • Developed NICIS by evaluating eighteen CBC+Diff + EIP parameters to distinguish culture-positive from non-infected patients.
  • Validated NICIS internally and externally using datasets from distinct time periods and locations.
  • NICIS values ranged from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating greater sepsis likelihood.
  • Achieved an area under the curve of 0.906 in training, 0.879 in internal validation, and 0.841 in external validation.
  • Outperformed C-reactive protein and total white blood cell count in all cohorts.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Neonates admitted to intensive care units are at high risk of hospital-acquired infections. While blood cultures remain the gold standard for sepsis diagnosis, they do not detect infection in every case. Host immune response markers, such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, can assist in earlier detection but also have limitations and carry additional costs. We have developed a Neonatal Intensive Care Infection Score (NICIS), which leverages extended complete blood count (CBC+Diff + EIP) parameters, which may require specific analyser configuration or software licensing, to extract additional diagnostic value. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford, UK) over one year. Eighteen CBC+Diff + EIP parameters were initially considered based on their ability to differentiate culture-positive patients from those without clinical suspicion of infection. NICIS was developed as a weighted score and validated internally using a temporally distinct dataset and externally using a four-year retrospective cohort from Erasmus University Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands). Results Incorporating eight CBC+Diff + EIP parameters, NICIS values ranged from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of sepsis. NICIS achieved an area under the curve of 0.906 in training, 0.879 in internal validation, and 0.841 in external validation, outperforming C-reactive protein and total white blood cell count in all datasets. Conclusions NICIS provides an interpretable tool for sepsis detection using routinely collected CBC+Diff + EIP data without additional sampling. Its performance across internal and external cohorts suggests sufficient diagnostic accuracy, although prospective studies are warranted to further assess generalisability and clinical utility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hyde et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd8021bfa21ec5bbf08843https://doi.org/10.1007/s44253-026-00121-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper