PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026The Journal of Chemical Physics0 citations

Interfacial density difference governs ice nucleation beyond lattice match

View Full Paper
WZWanyu ZhaoTLTianshu Li

Key Points

  • This research aims to uncover the microscopic factors influencing heterogeneous ice nucleation, particularly the role of interfacial density differences.
  • Utilized forward flux sampling simulations to analyze ice nucleation on graphene substrates.
  • Investigated the relationship between lattice constant, density difference, and nucleation rate.
  • Examined a variety of surface hydrophilicities and lattice mismatches.
  • The highest ice nucleation rate was found at a lattice constant that does not match either bulk ice or the critical nucleus.
  • Demonstrated that the density difference between interfacial water and ice significantly influences the nucleation rate.
  • Established a global correlation between interfacial density differences and ice nucleation rates across varying surface conditions.

Abstract

Heterogeneous ice nucleation is ubiquitous in nature, yet the microscopic factors governing its kinetics are complex and remain incompletely understood. A widely adopted view is that an effective ice nucleator should exhibit minimal lattice mismatch with ice when other factors are identical. Here, using forward flux sampling simulations, we show that this criterion breaks down for graphene substrates: The highest ice nucleation rate occurs at a lattice constant that matches neither bulk ice nor the critical ice nucleus. We demonstrate that this counterintuitive behavior is attributed to the density difference between interfacial water and ice in the first contact layer. Enhanced surface hydrophilicity induces a negative lattice mismatch that minimizes this density difference, thus maximizing the nucleation rate. Strikingly, the interfacial water-ice density difference exhibits a global correlation with heterogeneous ice nucleation rates across a wide range of surface hydrophilicities and lattice mismatches. These results establish density difference, rather than lattice match, as a fundamental and transferable descriptor of ice nucleation efficiency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd8021bfa21ec5bbf0885chttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0331651
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of substrate mismatch, orientation, and flexibility on heterogeneous ice nucleation2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Substrate Lattice Parameter and Surface Wettability Govern Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation: A Molecular Dynamics Study2025
  3. 3Understanding the heterogeneous nucleation of ice on silver iodide using deep potential molecular dynamics2025
  4. 4Effects of convex surface roughness on heterogeneous ice nucleation2024
  5. 5Interfacial Ice Density Fluctuations Inform Surface Ice-Philicity2024 · 4 citations