PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems0 citationsOpen Access

Combining Shape of Trajectories with MHI and their Directional Derivative-Based Description for Human Activity Recognition

SBSiddharth BhorgeMWMedha WyawahareVMVijay Mane

Key Points

  • This research aims to create a framework for recognizing human activities by integrating trajectory shapes with spatial and temporal information.
  • Developed a unified framework for human activity recognition by combining trajectory shapes and Motion History Image cues.
  • Extracted key points using MHI to mask trajectories, utilizing Histogram of Directional Derivative for feature representation.
  • Classified combined features with a multiclass Support Vector Machine after encoding through a Bag-of-Visual-Words model.
  • Achieved accuracies of 95.4%, 95.83%, 100%, and 89% on benchmark datasets: URADL, KTH, Weizmann, and UCF101, respectively.
  • Demonstrated robustness to illumination changes, occlusion, and background clutter.
  • Outperformed several state-of-the-art methods in human activity recognition.

Abstract

This research introduces a unified framework for human activity recognition that integrates global temporal characteristics, local spatial information, and trajectory shape cues. Trajectory shapes are extracted by tracking key points using a Motion History Image (MHI) as a mask, eliminating the need for unreliable key-point and trajectory tracking. The selected key points from both the intensity image (local spatial information) and the MHI (global temporal information) are represented using the Histogram of Directional Derivative (HODD) descriptor, which effectively captures their visual and structural attributes. The combined feature representation is encoded through a Bag-of-Visual-Words (BoVW) model, and classification is performed using a multiclass Support Vector Machine (SVM). Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets—URADL, KTH, Weizmann, and UCF101—yield accuracies of 95.4%, 95.83%, 100%, and 89%, respectively, demonstrating robustness to illumination changes, occlusion, and background clutter, and outperforming several state-of-the-art methods. Overall, the proposed framework offers a computationally efficient and highly discriminative solution for human activity recognition by effectively fusing trajectory shape, spatial, and temporal descriptors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bhorge et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fececcb9154b0b82876061https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.17.5.5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Short-Term Human Activity Recognition Based on Adaptive Variational Mode Decomposition and Information-Enhanced Hilbert Transform2026
  2. 2Random forest based robust human activity detection system using hybrid feature2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3A Multimodal Graph Contrastive Learning for Human Activity Recognition Using Deep Learning Technique2026
  4. 4Enhancing Human Activity Recognition through Integrated Multimodal Analysis: A Focus on RGB Imaging, Skeletal Tracking, and Pose Estimation2024 · 21 citations
  5. 5View-Invariant Deep Architecture for Human Action Recognition Using Two-Stream Motion and Shape Temporal Dynamics2020 · 144 citations