PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026The Korean History Education Review0 citations

Issues of Conflict and Cooperation between Historians and Archivists - Focusing on the Use of Historical Records -

View Full Paper
TKTae Jeong Kim

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the widening gap between historians and archivists in historical record management due to institutional factors.
  • Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the effects of the Public Records Management Act in Korea.
  • Assessment of current practices between historians and archivists regarding historical records.
  • Recommendations for establishing communication platforms and joint projects.
  • Increased infrastructure for records management did not reduce the divide; it actually worsened it.
  • Historians exhibit little interest in record selection, leaving it to archivists who hold full responsibility.
  • Proposes the establishment of a platform for continuous dialogue and collaboration between the two.

Abstract

The enactment of the Public Records Management Act in 1999 served as the institutional foundation for the subsequent qualitative and quantitative growth of archives in Korea. It significantly contributed to the emergence of records managers and archivists dedicated to records management. Furthermore, it facilitated the expansion of the infrastructure needed for advanced records management, systematizing various procedures, including the description and arrangement of records, while solidifying the infrastructure for digitalization. However, the expansion of this institutional and physical foundation did not automatically narrow the gap between historians and archivists. Rather, as the foundation and facilities for records management expanded, the gap widened. In the case of historical records, full authority and responsibility were entrusted to archivists, while historians showed little interest in the selection and appraisal of records. The reasons for this divide stem from historical and institutional factors. Therefore, it is necessary to develop measures to overcome these historical and structural limitations. In the long term, this involves establishing a plan to merge the National Institute of Korean History and the National Archives of Korea. In the short to medium term, it is necessary to build an archival platform to ensure continuous communication between the two. Various public forums, including joint academic conferences, must be established so that both historians and archivists can continuously exchange information on historical records and conduct cross-reviews. While historians should actively participate in the selection and evaluation of historical records, archivists must pay attention to the trends and methodologies of the historical community. The current tendency for each side to work and perform tasks in isolation only widen the gap between the two. Above all, the most urgent task is for both parties to pursue joint projects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tae Jeong Kim (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fececcb9154b0b828760ffhttps://doi.org/10.18622/kher.2026.3.177.1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bridging Artifact and Digital Content Management: Challenges in the National Museum of Korean Contemporary History2025
  2. 2Institutional Responses to History Destruction Movements Linked with Political Power: The Establishment of a Unified Historical Association and the ‘National Advisory Committee on History Policy’2026
  3. 3Restoration of Context through the Utilization of Museum Archives: A Case Study of Folklife Archive at National Folk Museum of Korea2025
  4. 4Curating the collective memory - Part 2.2026
  5. 5Curating the Collective Memory - Part 22026