PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies0 citationsOpen Access

A comparative analysis of hydrological drought in the Rur catchment under human and natural impacts

View Full Paper
YWYou WuDBDaniel BachmannHSHolger Schüttrumpf

Key Points

  • This research investigates how human activities and natural factors interact to influence hydrological drought in the Rur catchment.
  • Computational analysis of standardized indices for 209 groundwater wells and 16 streamflow gauges.
  • Hierarchical clustering of groundwater and streamflow data to identify drought clusters.
  • Analysis of cluster-mean hydrographs using run theory and cross-correlation to assess drought propagation.
  • Five groundwater clusters (SGI_C1–SGI_C5) and three streamflow clusters (SSI_C1–SSI_C3) identified.
  • Strong groundwater–surface water interactions found, affecting drought characteristics and propagation.
  • Reservoir operations reduced streamflow drought severity.

Abstract

Rur river catchment, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany In a changing climate, the propagation of drought through coupled groundwater–surface water systems remains difficult to investigate, particularly in catchments strongly influenced by human activities. This study presents a joint analysis of groundwater and streamflow droughts in the anthropogenically influenced Rur river catchment. Standardized indices were computed for 209 groundwater wells (standardized groundwater level index, SGI) and 16 streamflow gauges (standardized streamflow index, SSI). Hierarchical clustering yielded five groundwater clusters (SGIC1–SGIC5) and three streamflow clusters (SSIC1–SSIC3). Cluster-mean hydrographs were analyzed using run theory and cross-correlation to characterize regional drought attributes and the propagation process. Regional groundwater droughts are strongly modulated by anthropogenic activities and local hydrogeology. Notably, SGIC2 shows a persistent declining trend, associated with nearby lignite open-pit mining. SGIC5, comprising wells near the Rur, exhibits shorter mean drought durations. In contrast, streamflow droughts respond rapidly to precipitation deficits and vary with topographic setting. The mountainous cluster SSIC2 shows the strongest correlation with the standardized precipitation index (SPI; r = 0. 60). In lowland regions, strong groundwater–surface water coupling is evident, with moderate-to-strong correlations between SGIC5 and SSIC1 (r = 0. 55) and between SGIC1 and SSIC3 (r = 0. 45), implying that concurrent groundwater drought can intensify streamflow drought. Reservoir operations mitigate streamflow drought severity in SSIC1 relative to SSIC3, which more closely reflects natural flow and exhibits more pronounced droughts. The study provides a transferable workflow for investigating hydrological drought propagation under anthropogenic influence. It highlights the roles of human water management, precipitation variability, and groundwater–river interaction in shaping drought dynamics across the groundwater and stream flow system. • Integrated drought analysis used clustering, run theory, and cross-correlation. • Five groundwater (SGI C1–C5) and three streamflow clusters (SSI C1–C3) were identified. • Groundwater–streamflow interactions strongly shape drought characteristics and propagation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf49b9154b0b82876402https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper