PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026npj Digital Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Hubris in the age of intelligent medicine—from clinical hierarchies to algorithmic amplification

View Full Paper
MPMilit S PatelMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterDSDavid ScalesCornell UniversityJAJanan ArslanCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Key Points

  • This Perspective examines how structural issues in medicine lead to iatrogenic harm and algorithmic inequity, urging for more humility and reflexivity.
  • Analyzed the role of professional privilege and institutional incentives in healthcare
  • Critiqued the assumption of technical competence equating to complete understanding
  • Discussed the implications of these issues in clinical, global health, and AI contexts.
  • Identified a relationship between professional privilege and increased iatrogenic harm.
  • Highlighted the dangers of assuming technical skills represent full knowledge.
  • Proposed actionable principles for restructuring healthcare practices.

Abstract

Hubris in contemporary medicine is less an individual failing than a structural condition produced by professional privilege, institutional incentives, and global asymmetries of power. This Perspective argues that modern health systems mistake technical competence for epistemic completeness, fueling iatrogenic harm and algorithmic inequity. We propose disciplined humility and structural reflexivity as operational principles, translated into concrete practices across clinical, global health, and AI contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf49b9154b0b8287649dhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02717-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper